Publication Cover
Research in Sports Medicine
An International Journal
Volume 30, 2022 - Issue 2
448
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Effects of shoe collar height and arch-support orthosis on joint stability and loading during landing

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 115-127 | Received 01 May 2020, Accepted 25 Jan 2021, Published online: 12 Feb 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This study examined the effects of shoe collar height and foot orthosis on ground reaction force (GRF), ankle and knee mechanics during landing. Sixteen male university basketball players performed drop landing when wearing different shoes with collar height (high vs. low) and foot orthoses (arch-support vs. flat). Biomechanical variables included vertical peak GRF and joint angles and moments in sagittal and coronal planes were analysed with two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (α = 0.05). Results indicated that high-collar shoes had significantly smaller peak ankle dorsiflexion (P < 0.001), smaller ankle sagittal total RoM (P < 0.001), higher forefoot peak GRF (P = 0.009) and peak knee valgus moment (P < 0.001) compared with low-collar shoes. Wearing arch-support orthoses induced higher forefoot peak GRF (P < 0.001) but smaller ankle inversion moment (P = 0.001) compared to flat-orthoses. Furthermore, significant interactions between collar-height and orthosis were found only for initial ankle plantarflexion (P = 0.023) and knee flexion (P = 0.035), but not in any kinetics variables. The findings suggest increased collar height and arch-support orthoses appear to reduce the risks of ankle sprains during landing, but might increase loading at adjacent joints.

Highlights

  • Wearing high-collar shoes reduced ankle sagittal motion and knee valgus moment during landing

  • Wearing foot orthosis exhibited smaller ankle inversion moment during landing

  • Increased collar height and arch-support orthoses led to higher impact force landing impact

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics

This study was approved by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Institutional Review Board (HSEAR20180912002).

Additional information

Funding

This work did not receive any report.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.