Enhancement of Fracture Toughness Characteristics of Woven Jute Fabric Mat Reinforced Epoxy Composites with SiC Fillers

ABSTRACT

Natural fiber reinforced composites are attracting the attention of industries toward a sustainable and environment-friendly material for the future demands. The main drawback pertaining to the use of natural fiber composites lies in its inferior strength in comparison to its counterpart synthetic fibers. This research focuses on improving the fracture toughness of woven jute fabric mat with different orientations (0°, 30° and 45°) in epoxy resin by incorporating fillers and tested in universal tensile testing machine. Silicon carbide (SiC) particles of three sizes 26 µm, 54 µm and 72 µm were incorporated in the matrix in different weight ratios (5%, 10% and 15%). The fracture toughness of the jute/epoxy composites increases with the increase in the amount of SiC particles up to 10% addition and then it shows decreasing trend with further addition. The fracture toughness values show upward trend when the fiber orientation changed from 0° to 45°. Fractography of the tested specimen captured by scanning electron microscope which reveals the fracture of fibers and micro cracks in the epoxy matrix due to the applied load. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is also conducted for predicting the most influencing parameters on the fracture toughness.

摘要

天然纤维增强复合材料正吸引着工业界的注意力，成为一种可持续和环保的材料，以满足未来的需求. 与使用天然纤维复合材料有关的主要缺点在于其强度低于相应的合成纤维. 本研究旨在通过添加填料并在万能拉伸试验机上进行试验，提高环氧树脂中不同取向（0°、30°和45°）的编织黄麻织物垫的断裂韧性. 三种尺寸为26 µm、54 µm和72 µm的碳化硅（SiC）颗粒以不同的重量比（5%、10%和15%）加入基体中. 黄麻/环氧复合材料的断裂韧性随着SiC颗粒添加量的增加而增加，添加量达到10%，然后随着添加量的进一步增加，断裂韧性呈下降趋势. 当纤维取向从0°变为45°时，断裂韧性值呈上升趋势. 扫描电子显微镜捕获的测试样品的断口，显示了由于施加的载荷导致的纤维断裂和环氧树脂基体中的微裂纹. 还进行了方差分析（ANOVA），以预测对断裂韧性影响最大的参数.

KEYWORDS:

• Polymer composite
• fracture toughness
• SiC filler
• epoxy resin
• woven jute fiber
• SEM

关键字:

• 聚合物复合材料
• 断裂韧性
• 填料
• 环氧树脂
• 机织黄麻纤维

Introduction

The growing environmental awareness and ecological sustainability made the researchers to turn their attention toward usage of the environmental-friendly materials in engineering applications (Mohammed et al. 2015). The common synthetic fibers used in reinforced composites are carbon, glass and Kevlar which are posing environmental challenges and necessitated the researchers around the world to turn their attention toward environmentally pollution free fibers such as natural fibers. Natural fibers are mainly obtained from plants and animals. The widely used fibers are acquired from plants like sisal, jute, flax, coconut, oil palm, etc. The plants offer fibers from bast, seed covering and grass and reeds (Faruk et al. 2012). The variation in the fiber due to growing condition and varieties in plant reflects in the mechanical behavior of the fiber composites. This challenge has been addressed by many researchers by implementing different methods in the preparation of natural composite in an efficient way for the optimal mechanical strength. Sarikaya, Çallioğlu, and Demirel (2019) investigated the performance of composite materials with birch, palm and eucalyptus fibers and epoxy resins by resin transfer molding method and molded fiber production method. The outcome of the investigations revealed that these methods will have more scope in the future for the fabrication of natural fiber reinforced composites. The mechanical performance of the natural fiber reinforced composites is enhanced by different methods which include fiber treatments, filler addition into the matrix and alignment of fibers in relation to the loading direction. One of the important mechanical properties of the composite is its fracture toughness. The fracture toughness of the natural fiber reinforced composites are inferior than its counterparts made from synthetic fiber reinforced composites (Sebe et al. 2000). The epoxy resin plates has lower fracture toughness due to its low load bearing ability. In general, the fracture toughness of epoxy resin can be increased by incorporating fibers into the resin matrix. Wong et al (Wong et al. 2010) have reported that the toughness can be improved by reinforcing the bamboo fiber into the neat polyester resin. The study exposed that there is an increase of 340% than neat polyester resin due to the addition of bamboo fibers into the neat resin. Bahar Tiber and Ersen Balcıoglu (Tiber and Balcıoğlu 2019) conducted studies using hybrid composites involving bamboo/cotton, modal/cotton and viscose/cotton fiber mate with epoxy. The fracture toughness of the modal/cotton composites appeared to be better than the other combination. Silva et al (Silva et al. 2006) studied the fracture behavior of (sisal/coconut fiber)/castor oil polyurethane composites. Further it was also suggested that the toughness can even be increased by giving chemical treatments to the fibers which increases the bonding strength between fiber and resin matrix. Khan et al (Khan et al. 2021) have conducted experiments by changing the arrangement of jute and kenaf mat layers to estimate the mechanical property variation due to the arrangement method. Kenaf/jute/kenaf (K/J/K), jute/kenaf/jute (J/K/J) and neat epoxy (EP) composites were fabricated and tested for mechanical properties. The study concluded that the K/J/K hybrid composites showed better mechanical properties which may be attributed to the better bonding between fiber/matrix. Dilip raja and Ananda kumar (Dilip Raja and Anand Kumar 2022) have analyzed the interwoven fibers of jute and Kevlar with epoxy matrix. Weaving patterns such as plain weave, basket weave, twill weave and satin weave were considered for experiments. Composites prepared out of these combinations were tested for mechanical properties. The observation revealed that plain weave and basket weave distributed the applied load in isotropic configuration. The satin weave showed the micro cracks in the matrix.

Stocchi et al. (2007) imposed different fiber treatments and found some improvement in the toughness property when the fibers were treated with silicone and alkali treatments. Another method of getting good mechanical strength is powder filling into the matrix. Many researchers obtained better mechanical properties in natural fiber reinforced composites by powder filling or hybridization methods. The improved property is the result of increase in rigidity of the composite due to particle addition into the matrix. The addition of filler particles in the composites produced higher modulus and reduction in material cost (Balcıoğlu and Yalçın 2020; Liu and Dai 2007). Ojha and Biswal (2019) observed the increase in tensile strength and impact load of palm stalk reinforced composite with the granite powder addition. Satapathy et al. (2010) used SiC Particles as a reinforcement filler which was derived from rice husk by plasma-processing method. It was observed that the addition of SiC particles enhanced the mechanical properties of the jute-epoxy composites. Determination of fracture toughness for the polymer composites with natural fibers and fillers is critical to understand the fatigue service life of the component. Razavi et al (Razavi et al. 2021) have investigated the influence of the functionalized polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibers in the carbon fiber epoxy matrix. When compared the functionalized and non-functionalized composite, the former had an increase in fracture energy by 50% than the latter. The sample with functionalized polyacrylonitrile showed an improvement in the inter-laminar strength by 27%. Researchers have also analyzed the fracture toughness characteristics of jute epoxy composites with the addition of rubber particles. Mahesh and Mahesh (2022) presented abrasive test of Jute epoxy rubber composite for different filler combinations, load and distance and found that rubber additives results in increased resistance to abrasion. Mahesh et al. 2022a, 2022b) devised a systematic study method which efficiently uses the waste rubber crumb as an alternative filler material for epoxy matrix for low velocity impact applications. Mahesh, Harursampath, and Mahesh (2022) studied the ballistic impact performance of jute reinforced polyethylene composite with nano-silica thickening agent and found that the composite can have high specific energy absorption characteristics with the high inclusion of nano-silica. Based on the literature review, natural fiber composites with reinforcement fillers are studied extensively with the certain limitations on the influence of fiber laminates and reinforcement particles on the fracture characteristics. Bisaria et al. (2015) studied the mechanical properties of short jute fiber reinforced composites with different fiber length of 5,10,15 and 20 mm. It was found that the composites prepared with 15 mm fiber length showed better mechanical properties. The composites with fiber length of 5 mm and 10 mm were having less interfacial bonding between matrixes and produced inferior mechanical properties. Since jute fiber mat has better interfacial bonding with the matrix it is preferred for composite preparation in industries. This research article mainly focuses on the improvement of the fracture characteristics for a woven jute Fabric mat epoxy composites reinforced with SiC filler in different particle size, various addition percentage and different orientation of the laminates.

Materials and methods

Materials

Plain woven jute fabric mat with areal weight of 330 g/m² and commercial grade epoxy resin was procured from local market. The selected woven jute fabric mat is having 12 EPI and 10 PPI. The metal die of 80 × 80x10 mm size was machined and used for the preparation of the composites. Table 1 gives the properties of the epoxy material used in this investigation. Figure 1 depicts the jute fiber mat used in this study. The reinforcement material selected as filler is Silicon carbide with sizes 26 µm, 54 µm and 72 µm.

Figure 1. Jute fiber mat.

Table 1. Epoxy resin property.

Parameter	Young’s modulus (Gpa)	Posson’s ratio	Tensile strength (Mpa)	Density (kg/mm^3)
`	240	0.3	206	1520

Methods

Fabrication of composites specimen

The specimen for compact tension test was prepared by hand layup method. The required number of fabric mats were cut with the size of 80 mm x 80 mm. Totally 8 layers were used for the preparation of the composite specimen. All layers were stacked one after another in metal die. Epoxy resin was mixed with reinforcement of SiC in the following weight percentage 5%, 10% and 15%. Epoxy resin with hardener in the ratio of 10:1 was poured between all the layers. Finally enough pressure has been given for 24 hours and the specimen was taken out after curing period. Figure 2 gives the stacking method followed in preparing the composite specimen of 0/90, 30/60 and 45/45. The compact tension specimens were cut according to ASTM E D5045 standard (Liu and Dai 2007; Silva et al. 2006). Figure 3 illustrates the compact tension parameters of the research. Figure 4 displays the prepared compact tension specimen in this study. The effective width of the specimen was taken as 50 mm. The specimen were given a precut of 25 mm.

Figure 2. Arrangement of woven jute mate in preparation of specimen ((a)[0/90]_{8 layers,} (a)[30/60]_{8 layers,} (a)[45/45]_{8 layers}).

Figure 3. Compact tension specimen.

Figure 4. Experimental jute/epoxy composite specimen.

Compact tension test

The fracture toughness of the jute fiber laminate composites was predicted by conducting Mode-I Fracture according the ASTM Standard ASTM E D5045 at normal room temperature condition using Deepak universal testing machine. The fracture test was conducted in plane-strain condition. The following equations are applied for predicting the Critical stress intensity factor (or) fracture toughness (K_IC). Figure 5 depicts the fracture testing of composites. The test was carried out at temperature of 30°C and with humidity of 60%. The cross-head speed of 1 m/sec was maintained for all the experiments. The load against the elongation data was obtained from the fracture test for predicting the fracture toughness of the composites.

Figure 5. Experimental set up used for fracture study (a) Testing equipment (b) Close up view of crack initiation.

Critical stress intensity factor (or) facture toughness

(1) $K_{\mathit{IC}}=\frac{P}{\mathit{B}\sqrt{\mathit{H}}}\mathit{f}\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)$(1)

Where B=Specimen thickness in mm; H=specimen width in mm; c= crack length in mm; P=Peak Load in test.

For CT specimen, the geometry factor, $\mathit{f}\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)$is given by

(2) $\mathit{f}\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)=\frac{2+\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)}{{\left(1-\frac{c}{H}\right)}^{1.5}}\left[0.866+4.64\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)-13.32{\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)}^2+14.72{\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)}^3-5.6{\left(\frac{c}{H}\right)}^3\right]$(2)

where relevant parameters are depicted in Figure 3

Also, in order to satisfy plane strain condition, the following conditions must be satisfied

(3) $\mathit{B}>2.5\frac{K_{IC}^2}{{\sigma }_{\mathrm{yield}}^2}$(3)

Where ${\sigma }_{\mathit{yield}}$ is the yield strength of the material determined from tensile test. Plastic zone can be calculated by

(4) $r_y\approx \frac{1}{2\mathit{\pi }}{\left(\frac{{\mathit{K}}_{\mathit{IC}}}{{\sigma }_{\mathit{yield}}}\right)}^2$(4)

Where $r_y$ is radius of plastic zone

Three tests were carried out for each variation of fiber angle. Fracture toughness plots of the specimens were obtained from load-displacement curves. The obtained results depicted were calculated average of the three tests conducted.

Scanning electron microscopic study

The fractured surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. The surfaces were scanned with magnification of 200 µm.

Results and discussion

Effect of fiber orientation on the fracture toughness

Figure 6(a–c) gives the effect of fiber orientation on the fracture toughness of the jute-epoxy composites. Figure 6(a) provides the effect of orientation angle on fracture toughness when 5% of the filler materials were added. For the arrangement of fiber in 0/90 composite specimen with 5% filler addition, the fracture toughness varies from 16.64 MPa√m to 19.74 Mpa√m while the particle size decreased from 26 µm to 72 µm. In the case of 30/60 fiber orientation set up, the fracture toughness increases from 21.53 MPa√m to 24.63 MPa√m for the particle size variation of 26 µm to 72 µm. The third variation of fiber orientation i.e 45/45 provided the fracture toughness of 26.41 MPa√mto 28.86 MPa√m. It was also clearly noted that the variation of fiber arrangements from 0/90 to 45/45 had an increasing trend of fracture toughness. The fracture toughness of the unfilled arrangements was also given for comparisons. This varies from 14.9 MPa√m to 24.53 MPa√m . This could be attributed to the fact that the alignment of the fibers in relation to the loading direction mainly alters its load bearing capability. The 0/90 arrangement possesses the less load bearing capability. While 45/45 arrangement of fibers carries more load due to equal load sharing between warp and weft fibers.

Figure 6. Effect of particle size on fracture toughness for various fiber orientation with varying filler percentages.

Among all combination lay out arrangements 45/45 showed better fracture toughness behavior. Figure 6(b) depicts the variation of the fracture toughness for 10% Filler addition in three types of fiber orientation respectively. The fracture toughness values range from 17.15 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 20.53 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$, 22.3 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 25.6 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ and 27.02 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 30.64 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ for filler size varying from 72 µm to 26 µm. Figure 6(b,c) displays the variation of the fracture toughness for 10% Filler addition in three types of fiber orientation respectively. The fracture toughness values range from 16.07 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 19.64 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$, 20.77 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 24.14 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ and 26.04 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 28.1 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ for filler size varying from 72 µm to 26 µm.

Effect of the filler material addition on the fracture toughness

The filler materials added into the matrix enhanced the load bearing ability of the composite and also resisted the crack formation to certain extent so that the part of the load is borne by this particle. The following Figure 7(a–c) shows the effect of filler materials addition on the fracture toughness of the composite specimen. The addition of filler was varied from 5% to 15%. In all the figures, it was evident that the fracture toughness increased up to 10% addition afterward it took decreasing trend. The reason for the decrease could be related to the fact that more amount of particles get agglomerated and forms more cleavage sites for fracture initiation. From the graphs it can be seen that the composite with 10% filling percentage possessed better fracture toughness 30.64 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ among all the combinations. This can be considered due to the pinning effect of the particles included in the matrix material. Crack pinning is created due to the obstruction of hard filler particles to the propagation of the crack (Garg and Mai 1988). Similar conclusions have also been drawn previously (Srivastava and Shembekar 1990).The fracture surface energy of the composites filled with Sic particles of 10% is maximum due to the pinning of crack and halts the crack propagation. The more amount of surface area of fracture faces increases the fracture surface energy.

Figure 7. Effect of filler material addition on fracture toughness for various fiber orientation with varying filler materials sizes.

Effect of the filler material size on the fracture toughness

The relation between the filler material size and fracture toughness of specimens is shown in Figure 8(a–c). The filler materials size greatly influences the fracture toughness values of the composites. Addition of large particles (72 µm) deteriorates the fracture toughness capacity of the composites. However, small particles such as 26 µm enhance the load bearing capability of the composites which also increase the fracture toughness of the composites. The maximum value of the fracture toughness 30.64Mpa$\text{sqrtm}$ was seen for composite with filler materials size of 26 µm. The minimum value 16.07 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ were observed for composites with 72 µm filler material. Fracture toughness of composites depends on the surface area of fracture faces. When the size of the filler particles gets increased the load distribution between matrixes is reduced. It paves the way for the crack formation easily. The may be attributed the less fracture toughness of the composites of 72 µm combination.

Figure 8. Effect of filler material size on fracture toughness for various fiber orientation with varying filler materials percentage.

Influence of the parameters on the fracture toughness

Taguchi’s orthogonal array was used to frame mathematical expression to achieve better fracture toughness by selecting suitable combination of process parameters such as orientation angle, filler particle size and filling percentage. Table 2 shows the factors and their levels. Table 3 shows the 27 experiments conducted to form mathematical correlation between input variables and fracture toughness. The table lists the experimental results of all the studies performed and also predicted responses of the corresponding input variables. It also lists the error between experimental and predicted responses.

Table 2. Factors and their levels.

Parameter Level	Orientation Angle(A)	Size of Particles(B)	Filling percentage (C)
Level 1	0/90	26	5
Level 2	30/60	54	10
Level 3	45/45	72	15

Table 3. Design of experiments for fracture toughness of L27 experiments conducted.

StdOrder	Run Order	OrientationAngle(A)	Size of Particles(B)	Filling percentage (C)	Experimental Fracture Toughness (FT) Mpa$\text{sqrtm}$	Predicted Fracture Toughness (FT) Mpa$\text{sqrtm}$	Error
1	27	0	26	5	19.79	19.905	−0.59068
2	11	0	26	10	20.54	20.825	−1.37099
3	25	0	26	15	19.65	19.583	0.324613
4	9	0	54	5	18.38	18.112	1.468794
5	18	0	54	10	19.08	19.000	0.436453
6	1	0	54	15	18.00	17.726	1.55615
7	10	0	72	5	16.64	16.571	0.407932
8	17	0	72	10	17.16	17.439	−1.62305
9	16	0	72	15	16.07	16.144	−0.43145
10	8	30	26	5	24.63	24.583	0.185938
11	3	30	26	10	25.62	25.429	0.733964
12	14	30	26	15	24.16	24.113	0.188956
13	2	30	54	5	23.12	22.993	0.571121
14	21	30	54	10	23.55	23.808	−1.09178
15	23	30	54	15	22.61	22.460	0.658295
16	22	30	72	5	21.53	21.584	−0.26516
17	24	30	72	10	22.37	22.378	−0.02233
18	6	30	72	15	20.77	21.009	−1.11745
19	26	45	26	5	28.86	29.095	−0.80979
20	19	45	26	10	30.65	29.904	2.478898
21	7	45	26	15	28.11	28.551	−1.55477
22	15	45	54	5	27.35	27.607	−0.91277
23	20	45	54	10	28.20	28.384	−0.64574
24	4	45	54	15	26.79	27.000	−0.77259
25	12	45	72	5	26.41	26.263	0.578447
26	5	45	72	10	27.03	27.020	0.022482
27	13	45	72	15	26.04	25.615	1.656282

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) is used to identify the variation of an output parameters to various inputs parameters. The purpose of the analysis of variance is to analyze which experimental parameters significantly influence the strength characteristics of composites prepared. In order to estimate the contribution of three parameters on the fracture toughness of composites ANOVA was performed using MINITAB 16.0. The optimum values for the influencing factors on fracture toughness can be obtained by this study. Table 4. presents the ANOVA results relative performance of composites of the study conducted for fracture toughness with a confidence level of 95%. The statistical significance was achieved for particular response with low value indication of p. The ANOVA analysis revealed that orientation angle (85.3%) had major effect on the fracture toughness of composites followed by filler material size (9.6) and filling percentage (0.2%). The table also shows the interaction factors effect of the responses. The interaction effect of the parameters appeared to be low in relation to the individual parameters effect.

Table 4. ANOVA results.

Source	DF	Seq SS	Adj SS	Adj MS	F	P	%Contribution
Regression	6	425.738	425.738	70.9563	67.0352	0
A	1	381.177	1.005	1.0052	10.096	0.005509	85.3
B	1	43.183	0.091	0.0913	0.917	0.351624	9.6
C	1	1.131	5.46	5.4598	54.84	0.000001	0.2
A*A	1	12.137	12.137	12.1367	121.905	0	2.7
B*B	1	0.329	0.329	0.3288	3.302	0.086859	0.07
C*C	1	7.012	7.012	7.0119	70.429	0	1.5
A*B	1	0.2	0.2	0.1996	2.005	0.17483
A*C	1	0.038	0.038	0.0382	0.384	0.543916
B*C	1	0.008	0.008	0.0083	0.084	0.775782
Error	17	1.693	1.693	0.0996
Total	26	446.907

The relationship among the process parameters were correlated by a mathematical equation given in equation (5). This equation can be used to estimate the theoretical fracture toughness of the composites.

Fracture Toughness (FT) = 17.802 + 0.0555211 A − 0.0254747 B + 0.838528 C + 0.00321855 A*A +0.000242839 A*B − 0.000492398 A*C − 0.000468088 B*B − 0.000227427 B*C −0.0432415 C*C … .(5)

Where A=Orientation angle; B=Particle size; C=Filling percentage

Morphology of fractures surface

Micro-cracks were observed in the unfilled and filled composites during test. As the load increased these cracks become macro in size tending to cause the specimen to fail by breaking. The damage conditions need to be analyzed both in micro and macro size for understanding the fracture mechanism. Figure 5 shows the macro-level crack initiation. Figure 5 shows the crack opening which will be unsafe situation for both filled and unfilled jute/epoxy composite specimen. Figure 9 shows the macro and micro magnification of the tested specimen under scanning electron microscope. The fracture damages like matrix crack, matrix deformation, debonding of fiber, fiber pullout and fracture are evident from the micro level examination. Further, it can be anticipated that the transverse crack also leads to an effect called fiber-bridging. In the woven jut mat arrangement of 0/90 orientation in which the fibers are arranged parallel to the loading direction, matrix bonding with fiber interface is weaker which augments the fiber pulled out and hence this combination withstands lesser load. Whereas 45/45 arrangement possesses better the bonding between fiber and matrix and is able to withstand more load. The occurrence of the smaller deformation in the SiC filled composite may be due to the decrease in ductility of the composite. The fillers materials tend to arrest the deformations of the matrix materials during loading condition.

Figure 9. Fracture surface scanning microscopic images of tested samples with different magnifications.

Conclusion

The fracture characteristics of woven jute composites with SiC loading have been studied in this research experimentally. The effect of the three parameters such as fiber orientation, filler material size and filler material loading was also analyzed.

• Specimens with different variations such as particle filling, fiber orientation have been fabricated to study the fracture toughness characteristics of woven jute fabric mate composites.

• ANOVA was performed using MINITAB 16.0 to obtain the optimum values for the influencing factors on fracture toughness.

• Fracture toughness values were improved with the introduction of SiC particles into the matrix of the woven jute fabric mat reinforced composite. The unfilled woven jute fabric mat composites fracture toughness values vary from 14.9 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ to 24.53 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$.

• The fracture toughness values increased proportionally in relation to the decrease in particle size. The maximum value of the fracture toughness 30.64 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ was seen for composite with filler materials size of 26 µm. The minimum value 16.07 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ was observed for composites with 72 µm filler material.

• The maximum value of the fracture toughness obtained in this study is for 45/45 arrangement of woven jute fabric mat with 8 layers is 30.45 MPa$\text{sqrtm}$ and 10% filling with 26 µm size of the particles.

• The fracture toughness values are seen to improve on the upside with the gradual loading of the SiC particles. The fracture toughness values increased gradually and obtained maximum value at 10% loading afterward it started decreasing.

• A correlation equation has been formulated to predict the influence of input process parameters on the desired output i.e fracture toughness.

• The damages such as agglomeration of fillers, matrix micro cracks, pull out of fibers and fiber breakages were revealed by the Scanning Electron Micrographs.

Highlights

• It brings out the detailed study of fracture toughness of natural fiber composites by incorporating SiC fillers.

• It also describes the prime phenomenal reasons behind the enhancement of toughness of the woven jute fabric mat reinforced epoxy composites.

• It specially elaborates the influence of fiber orientation, volume of filler material and size of filler material, which has not been studied in detail elsewhere in the literature.

• The better process parameter (fiber orientation, filler volume and size) obtained by using Taghuchi’s method.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).