255
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Assessment of the Durability of Medical Examination Gloves

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 607-612 | Published online: 17 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

This study determined the durability of various types of medical examination gloves using a laboratory test developed by the researchers. Results of this testing are compared with a simulated clinical method, also developed by the researchers, found to produce failures at rates similar to actual clinical use. Ten types of exam gloves were tested. One set of gloves was tested using a glove durability method. A second set was worn and conditioned using a simulated clinical method for comparison. The third set consisted of a control set of gloves that were not stressed. Samples consisted of 100 gloves combined from 2 or 4 manufacturers. All gloves were water-leak tested as the last step. The glove durability method created failures at similar rates to the simulated clinical method. The majority of the defects were located in the finger regions of the gloves. Durability of powdered and powder-free vinyl gloves was inferior to that of other glove types tested, with failure rates ranging from 24% to 42%, compared with 3% to 17% for the other glove types tested. Glove durability was also affected by the powdered state of the gloves and the user having long fingernails.

Acknowledgments

The mention of commercial products, their source, or their use in connection with material reported herein is not to be construed as either an actual or an implied endorsement of such products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Notes

ADefect rate is significantly higher than the control rate (Chi squared statistic, one-tailed test, α = 0.05, p-value ≤ 0.05).

*Statistically significant (Chi squared statistic, one-tailed test, α = 0.05, p-value ≤ 0.05).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.