216
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison Between Urinary o-Cresol and Toluene as Biomarkers of Toluene Exposure

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1-9 | Published online: 07 Apr 2011
 

The characteristics of urinary o-cresol (o-C) and urinary toluene (TOL-U) as biomarkers of occupational exposure to toluene were comparatively evaluated. One hundred healthy male rotogravure printing workers and 161 male and female control subjects were studied. Personal exposure to airborne toluene (TOL-A) during the shift was determined as a time-weighted average. Simple analytical procedures based on solid phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography/mass spectometry analysis were applied to the determination of end-shift o-C and TOL-U. Median TOL-A was 48 (6.0–162.0) mg/m3 in printers and 0.021 (<0.003–0.137) mg/m3 in controls. o-C was 0.185 (0.032–0.948) mg/g creatinine in printers and 0.027 (<0.006–0.330) mg/g creatinine in the controls. TOL-U was 7.6 (1.8–23.9) μ g/L in printers and 0.140 (0.094–0.593) μ g/L in the controls. According to all indices, exposure to toluene was higher in printers than in the controls. Nevertheless, the distribution of o-C in the two groups partially overlapped, whereas such behavior was not found in TOL-U. Both o-C and TOL-U in printers were correlated with TOL-A (Pearson's on log10-transformed variables r = 0.704 and 0.844, respectively) and with each other (r = 0.683). Smoking habits significantly increased the excretion of o-C but not of TOL-U. From the point of view of sampling conditions and analytical requirements, TOL-U and o-C showed similar properties, but comparison of their intrinsic characteristics showed that TOL-U had higher specificity and sensitivity, lower background values, was better correlated with airborne exposure, and was not influenced by cigarette smoking. Therefore TOL-U may be considered superior to o-C as a biomarker of occupational exposure to toluene.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are indebted to the health personnel of the rotogravure printing industry and to the subjects who volunteered for the study.

Notes

A Sources: References 27,29,30.

B Sources: Reference 31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.