141
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Departments

Analytical Performance Criteria

Field Evaluation of Diacetyl Sampling and Analytical Methods

, , , , &
Pages D111-D116 | Published online: 26 Sep 2008
 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the significant collaboration of Kelly Howard and Dan Leiner for this work. Data collection support from James Couch, Brian Curwin, Chad Dowell, Kevin L Dunn, Alan Echt, Alberto Garcia, and Denise Giglio is appreciated as is the field guidance from Donald Booher, Karl Feldman, and Dan Farwick.

The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Notes

A During Surveys 1 and 2, acetoin samples were analyzed only by the NIOSH method.

A P-values were calculated according to Signed Rank test comparing median difference between method results.

A P-values were calculated according to Spearman correlation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.