426
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Quantitative Crystalline Silica Exposure Assessment for a Historical Cohort Epidemiologic Study in the German Porcelain Industry

, , , , &
Pages 516-528 | Published online: 14 Jun 2010
 

Abstract

A time-dependent quantitative exposure assessment of silica exposure among nearly 18,000 German porcelain workers was conducted. Results will be used to evaluate exposure-response disease risks. Over 8000 historical industrial hygiene (IH) measurements with original sampling and analysis protocols from 1954–2006 were obtained from the German Berufs- genossenschaft der keramischen-und Glas-Industrie (BGGK) and used to construct a job exposure matrix (JEM). Early measurements from different devices were converted to modern gravimetric equivalent values. Conversion factors were derived from parallel historical measurements and new side-by-side measurements using historical and modern devices in laboratory dust tunnels and active workplace locations. Exposure values were summarized and smoothed using LOESS regression; estimates for early years were derived using backward extrapolation techniques. Employee work histories were merged with JEM values to determine cumulative crystalline silica exposures for cohort members. Average silica concentrations were derived for six primary similar exposure groups (SEGs) for 1938–2006. Over 40% of the cohort accumulated <0.5 mg; just over one-third accumulated >1 mg/m3-years. Nearly 5000 workers had cumulative crystalline silica estimates >1.5 mg/m3-years. Similar numbers of men and women fell into each cumulative exposure category, except for 1113 women and 1567 men in the highest category. Over half of those hired before 1960 accumulated >3 mg/m3-years crystalline silica compared with 4.9% of those hired after 1960. Among those ever working in the materials preparation area, half accumulated >3 mg/m3-year compared with 12% of those never working in this area. Quantitative respirable silica exposures were estimated for each member of this cohort, including employment periods for which sampling used now obsolete technologies. Although individual cumulative exposure estimates ranged from background to about 40 mg/m3-years, many of these estimates reflect long-term exposures near modern exposure limit values, allowing direct evaluation of lung cancer and silicosis risks near these limits without extrapolation. This quantitative exposure assessment is the largest to date in the porcelain industry.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the invaluable technical assistance of the VBG (former BGGK), especially Mr. Steinig and Mr. Böhm for the support in conducting the dust measurements and related analytics; of the staff of the IGF, notably Dr. Fricke and Mr. Jackisch, who managed the measurements in the wind tunnel; and to the BGIA of the DGUV, particularly to Dr. Mattenklott, for many helpful discussions about the interpretation of the results of historic measurements.

We thank the Scientific Advisory Group, specifically Drs. Lesley Rushton (chair), Peter Morfeld, Dirk Taeger, Frank Bochmann, and Hans Kromhout, all of whom provided helpful suggestions on the study methods and analysis, and on drafts of this report.

The project was sponsored by the Berufsgenossenschaft der keramischen und Glas-Industrie (BGGK, now VBG), the Steinbruchs-Berufsgenossenschaft (StBG), and by EUROSIL, the European Association of Industrial Silica Producers, with additional support from other trade associations and individual companies.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.