230
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Biomarkers of Mercury Exposure in Two Eastern Ukraine Cities

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 187-193 | Published online: 04 Mar 2011
 

Abstract

This study evaluates biomarkers of mercury exposure among residents of Horlivka, a city in eastern Ukraine located in an area with geologic and industrial sources of environmental mercury, and residents of Artemivsk, a nearby comparison city outside the mercury-enriched area. Samples of urine, blood, hair, and nails were collected from study participants, and a questionnaire was administered to obtain data on age, gender, occupational history, smoking, alcohol consumption, fish consumption, tattoos, dental amalgams, home heating system, education, source of drinking water, and family employment in mines. Median biomarker mercury concentrations in Artemivsk were 0.26 μg/g-Cr (urine), 0.92 μg/L (blood), 0.42 μg/g (hair), 0.11 μg/g (toenails), and 0.09 μg/g (fingernails); median concentrations in Horlivka were 0.15 μg/g-Cr (urine), 1.01 μg/L (blood), 0.14 μg/g (hair), 0.31 μg/g (toenails), and 0.31 μg/g (fingernails). Biomarkers of mercury exposure for study participants from Horlivka and Artemivsk are low in comparison with occupationally exposed workers at a mercury recycling facility in Horlivka and in comparison with exposures known to be associated with clinical effects. Blood and urinary mercury did not suggest a higher mercury exposure among Horlivka residents as compared with Artemivsk; however, three individuals living in the immediate vicinity of the mercury mines had elevated blood and urinary mercury, relative to overall results for either city. For a limited number of residents from Horlivka (N = 7) and Artemivsk (N = 4), environmental samples (vacuum cleaner dust, dust wipes, soil) were collected from their residences. Mercury concentrations in vacuum cleaner dust and soil were good predictors of blood and urinary mercury.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Boris Panov and Yuri Panov of the Donetsk National Technical University, Donetsk, Ukraine; Volodymyr Mukhin, Donetsk Institute of Hygiene and Occupational Health, Donetsk, Ukraine; Chiemeka Chine, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; Suzette Morman, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado; and Joe Bunnell, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, for their help with this study. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers selected by the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. This study was supported, in part, by a Cooperative Grant (UKG1-2633) from the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation.

Any use of trade, product or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. government.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.