760
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of two quantitative fit-test methods using N95 filtering facepiece respirators

&
 

ABSTRACT

Current regulations require annual fit testing before an employee can wear a respirator during work activities. The goal of this research is to determine whether respirator fit measured with two TSI Portacount instruments simultaneously sampling ambient particle concentrations inside and outside of the respirator facepiece is similar to fit measured during an ambient aerosol condensation nuclei counter quantitative fit test.

Sixteen subjects (ten female; six male) were recruited for a range of facial sizes. Each subject donned an N95 filtering facepiece respirator, completed two fit tests in random order (ambient aerosol condensation nuclei counter quantitative fit test and two-instrument real-time fit test) without removing or adjusting the respirator between tests. Fit tests were compared using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

The real-time two-instrument method fit factors were similar to those measured with the single-instrument quantitative fit test. The first four exercises were highly correlated (r > 0.7) between the two protocols. Respirator fit was altered during the talking or grimace exercise, both of which involve facial movements that could dislodge the facepiece.

Our analyses suggest that the new real-time two-instrument methodology can be used in future studies to evaluate fit before and during work activities.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank 3M and NIOSH for lending Portacounts to our lab and 3M and TSI for performing calibrations on the Portacounts. We thank Marc Roe and Jessica Hauge for assistance with protocol development and Sue Danisch for training in subject facial dimensions.

Funding

This project was funded by the Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago. Margaret Sietsema received support from NIOSH Grant No. T42/OH008672. None of the authors has any financial or other conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.