![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
The Environmental Relative Moldiness Index (ERMI) is a scale created to compare mold contamination levels in U.S. homes. The ERMI was developed as a result of the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) first American Healthy Homes Survey (AHHS I), which sampled 1,096 homes selected to be representative of the U.S. housing stock. In AHHS I, a dust sample from each home was analyzed using quantitative PCR assays (qPCR) for 36 common indoor molds: 26 Group 1 molds, which were associated with water damage in homes and 10 Group 2 molds, which primarily enter the home from the outside environment. In 2019, HUD completed AHHS II by sampling 695 homes. Because lead was banned from paint in 1978, a larger proportion of homes selected for AHHS II had been built before 1978 compared to AHHS I. The 36 ERMI molds were analyzed in AHHS II exactly as in AHHS I. For the 36-ERMI molds, the rates of detection, average concentrations, and geometric means were in significant concordance (p < 0.001) between AHHS I and II, indicating that the ERMI methodology was stable over time. However, the average ERMI value in AHHS II homes was greater than in AHHS I. The reason for the difference was investigated by examining the Group 1 and 2 mold populations. The average summed logs of Group 1 molds were significantly greater in homes built before 1978 than the average for homes built later. Conversely, the average summed logs of Group 2 mold populations were the same in homes built before 1978 and homes built later. Since the summed logs of Group 2 mold is subtracted from the summed logs of Group 1 molds in the ERMI calculation, the average ERMI value was higher in AHHS II homes than AHHS I. In conclusion, by using the ERMI metric, we were able to demonstrate that water damage and mold growth were more likely to occur as homes get older.
Acknowledgments
The United States Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development partially funded and managed the research described here. It has been subjected to the Agency’s administrative review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. AHHS II and the collection of the dust samples were funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official positions of HUD.