![Sample our Built Environment journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5926/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Built-Environment.jpg"})
Abstract
In a unanimous decision in Lingle v. Chevron (544 U.S._), released May 23, the U.S. Supreme Court provided resounding support for the position advocated by APA and others concerned about this regulatory takings case. The Court concluded that the Agins “substantially advances” test, which has added so much confusion in takings analysis, is clearly inappropriate.