Publication Cover
Planning & Environmental Law
Issues and decisions that impact the built and natural environments
Volume 62, 2010 - Issue 9: Cases 317–357
19
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Stop the Beach Renourisment—Six Perspectives

 

Abstract

“No foul,” the Justices unanimously declared on June 17 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Florida does not owe six Panhandle beachfront property owners monetary compensation from the state’s beach renourishment program (Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S.Ct. 2592, June 17, 2010; see 62 PEL 334 in this issue). The 8–0 decision (retiring Justice Stevens did not participate presumably because he owns beach property in Florida) affirmed the ruling of the state’s highest court.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.