Publication Cover
LEUKOS
The Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society
Volume 15, 2019 - Issue 2-3: Lighting Research Methods
8,885
Views
92
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Adequacy of Immersive Virtual Reality for the Perception of Daylit Spaces: Comparison of Real and Virtual Environments

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 203-226 | Received 02 Jul 2017, Accepted 10 Nov 2017, Published online: 17 Jan 2018
 

ABSTRACT

This article presents a novel experimental method that uses a virtual reality (VR) headset, aiming to provide an alternative environment for the conduction of subjective assessments of daylit spaces. This method can overcome the difficulty of controlling the variation of luminous conditions, one of the main challenges in experimental studies using daylight, and its novelty lies in the implementation of physically based renderings into an immersive virtual environment. The present work investigates the adequacy of the proposed method to evaluate five aspects of subjective perception of daylit spaces: the perceived pleasantness, interest, excitement, complexity, and satisfaction with the amount of view in the space. To this end, experiments with 29 participants were conducted to compare users’ perceptions of a real daylit environment and its equivalent representation in VR and test the effect of the display method on the participants’ perceptual evaluations, reported physical symptoms, and perceived presence in the virtual space. The results indicate a high level of perceptual accuracy, showing no significant differences between the real and virtual environments on the studied evaluations. In addition, there was a high level of perceived presence in the virtual environment and no significant effects on the participants’ physical symptoms after the use of the VR headset. Following these findings, the presented experimental method in VR seems very promising for use as a surrogate to real environments in investigating the aforementioned five dimensions of perception in daylit spaces.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Steve Fotios for his valuable feedback, Professor Jean-Marie Fürbringer and Peter Hansen for their technical support in the design of experiments, Lorenzo Cantelli for his help with the VR headset, and Dr. Parag Rastogi for his contributions in the analysis of solar radiation for the sky descriptions.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and through a grant awarded by the Velux Stiftung Foundation in the framework of Project 1022: “Identifying the Impact of Regional Differences on the Perceived Quality of Daylit Architectural Spaces: A Comparison Study across Different Latitudes.”