Publication Cover
Journal of Dual Diagnosis
research and practice in substance abuse comorbidity
Volume 9, 2013 - Issue 4
912
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psychopharmacology & Neurobiology: Article

Mecamylamine for Treatment of People With Dual Diagnoses of Depression and Alcohol Dependence

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 301-310 | Published online: 28 Oct 2013
 

Abstract

Objective: Currently there is no consensus on the best treatment for individuals with dual diagnoses of alcohol dependence and depression. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of mecamylamine augmentation of an antidepressant in reducing drinking, smoking, and depressive symptoms. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized 12-week treatment trial comparing mecamylamine to placebo. Twenty-one participants with diagnosed alcohol dependence and comorbid depression were included in this study. Eleven participants were assigned to mecamylamine and ten were assigned to placebo. The main outcome variables included drinking measures and depressive symptoms. Analyses included all participants. Results: Mecamylamine augmentation was effective in reducing drinking outcomes particularly in nonsmokers. Symptoms of depression decreased for all participants and there was a trend indicating that this was more pronounced again for nonsmokers receiving mecamylamine. The rates of smoking decreased for all smokers. There were no significant differences in the rates of side effect reporting between those receiving mecamylamine and those receiving placebo or smokers versus nonsmokers. Conclusions: Mecamylamine was more effective than placebo in reducing drinking in nonsmokers. The data regarding depressive symptoms and smoking need further study. This study is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov under number NCT00563797.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Support for this study was provided by National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) and the Veterans Affairs VISN I Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC). The funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.