Abstract
Background: In a military or terrorist scenario, combination of organophosphorus compounds (OP) poisoning with physical trauma requiring surgical treatment and thus general anaesthesia are possible. Previous in vitro studies showed an altered potency of relevant anaesthetics during cholinergic crisis. Hence, it is not clear, which anaesthetics are suitable to achieve the necessary stage of surgical anaesthesia in OP poisoning.
Methods: In the present study, different anaesthetic regimens (ketamine-midazolam, propofol-fentanyl, thiopental-fentanyl), relevant in military emergency medicine, were examined in soman-poisoned rats. Clinical signs and cardiovascular variables were recorded continuously. Blood samples for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity were drawn. After euthanasia or death of the animals, brain and diaphragm were collected for cholinesterase assays.
Results: Propofol-fentanyl and thiopental-fentanyl resulted in surgical anaesthesia throughout the experiments. With ketamine-midazolam, surgical anaesthesia without respiratory impairment could not be achieved in pilot experiments (no soman challenge) and was therefore not included in the study. Soman-poisoned and control animals required a comparable amount of propofol-fentanyl or thiopental-fentanyl. In combination with atropine, significantly less propofol was needed. Survival rate was higher with thiopental compared to propofol. Atropine improved survival in both groups. Blood and tissue AChE activities were strongly inhibited after soman administration with and without atropine treatment.
Discussion: The current in vivo study did not confirm concerns of altered potency of existing anaesthetic protocols for the application of propofol or thiopental with fentanyl due to soman poisoning. Despite severe cholinergic crisis, sufficient anaesthetic depth could be achieved in all animals.
Conclusion: Further experiments in in vivo models closer to human pharmaco- and toxicokinetics (e.g., swine) are required for confirmation of the initial findings and for improving extrapolation to humans.
Acknowledgements
We thank Natalie Boos, Madlen Baumann, Janja Letzelter and Gülcan Duman for their excellent technical assistance. The authors are thankful to the German Armed Forces Advisory Board of Anaesthesiology for discussing relevant anaesthetic protocols.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.