368
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Basic Research

Relative safety and quality of various dietary supplement products U.S. Service Members ask about

ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 737-744 | Received 22 Nov 2021, Accepted 27 Jan 2022, Published online: 14 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Context

The purpose of this project was to determine types of dietary supplement products U.S. Service Members frequently ask about and identify risks associated with select products that consumers should be aware of when considering their use.

Methods

Forty-one dietary supplement products frequently asked about through the Operation Supplement Safety’s (OPSS.org) Ask-the-Expert portal were selected. Product analysis was performed to verify whether select products were accurately labeled and to identify any risky ingredients contained in these products. Operation Supplement Safety Risk Assessment Scorecard criteria were additionally used as a screening tool to assess a product’s relative safety potential.

Results

Among the select dietary supplements, 12 (29.3%) were marketed as pre-workout products; 14 (34.1%) for weight loss; four (9.8%) for male enhancement/testosterone boosters; and 11 (26.8%) as body building supplements. Eleven (26.8%) products had accurate labels; only eight of these had accurate labels plus no risky ingredients listed on the labels. Twenty-six (63.4%) products were misbranded; 10 (24.4%) were adulterated, and six (14.6%) were both misbranded and adulterated. Risky ingredients appeared on 23 (56%) of all product labels. Eight of these 23 products also had additional risky ingredients not listed on the labels but detected through analysis. According to the Scorecard based on label claims, 35 (85.4%) received a rating of “no-go/risky”.

Conclusions

U.S. Service Members and the public at large should be aware that dietary supplements may contain risky ingredients and know how to identify ingredients on the label to evaluate potential risk.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no financial interests or relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by the Consortium for Health and Military Performance and Operation Supplement Safety award number HU0001-18-2-0099.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.