Abstract
This research addresses recent calls to incorporate multidisciplinary approaches in the study of firearm violence by utilizing an elaborated criminal events perspective to explore the correlates of firearm injury severity. A unique dataset of nonfatal firearm injury data are derived from official police reports, allowing the use of a medically validated measure of injury trauma in place of more typical injury indicators. The relative and collaborative contributions of criminological and public health indicators for explaining variation in levels of injury severity are assessed. Multinomial logit models suggest that critical injuries are more likely among older victims, victims who knew their assailants, and victims who refused to cooperate with police. Additionally, the likelihood of critical victim injuries decreased as the time to report an incident to the police increased. The strongest correlates were measures of incident circumstances and the number of gunshot wounds a victim received. In all, these results reveal that a combination of measures from both fields is needed to provide a deeper understanding of injury severity outcomes.
The authors would like to thank Dr. April Brill, D.O., Fellow of the American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians (FACOEP), for her critical reviews and commentary on early versions of this article. Additionally, many thanks to Ryan Martz for his assistance in collecting and interpreting regency gaggle data.
Notes
1. It is important to keep in mind that single incidents may have a number of nonfatal victims as well as one or more victims with fatal injuries (e.g., dead on scene and/or dead on arrival to treatment center). Fatalities are not included in these data.