870
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Different people, different incentives? Examining the public acceptance of smartphone-based persuasive strategies for sustainable travel using psychographic segmentation

, , &
Pages 1-21 | Received 24 Nov 2019, Accepted 04 Oct 2020, Published online: 15 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

The development and delivery of ICT-based persuasive strategies for the adoption of more environmental-friendly modes of transport is an emerging strategy to help tackle the problem of excessive use of individual Conventionally Fueled Vehicles (CFVs). The efficiency of this approach, like other information-based schemes, can benefit from the knowledge of which groups of individuals are more responsive to these types of interventions. The goal of this study is to examine the level of acceptability of persuasive schemes delivered using smartphone applications across different population segments. A cross-sectional survey was applied to 920 university students in Curitiba, a roughly 2-million inhabitant Brazilian city. The questionnaire was developed considering two groups of indicators: individual determinants of travel behavior, which were extracted from theories of social psychology (i.e. the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Norm-Activation Model and others), as well as stated intentions and attitudes toward a range of eleven different persuasive strategies (money or voucher rewards, points and rankings, social media sharing, etc.). Groups with different psychographic profiles were extracted from the sample using cluster and discriminant analyses. The acceptability of persuasive strategies were compared between segments. Results show a higher individual preference toward financial rewards and a relatively lower acceptability of social media tools. The acceptance level of groups that display higher control over the use of non-motorized forms of transport is higher than groups that are more psychologically predisposed to CFVs.

Acknowledgements

The data collection process had the essential cooperation of the following universities in Curitiba: Centro Tecnológico Universidade Positivo - CTUP; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná - PUC; Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR; Centro Universitário Internacional - UNINTER; Universidade Norte do Paraná - UNOPAR; Universidade Positivo - UP and Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná – UTFPR.

Notes

1 In Brazil, at the time of the survey, the monthly minimum wage was R$954,00.

2 All the significances reported on the text of this sub-section consider the 5% significance level.

Additional information

Funding

This paper stems from a PhD research funded by the Brazilian agency CnPQ (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.