ABSTRACT
Homeschooling has witnessed an upsurge in the United States since the movement for school choice gained momentum in the 1990s. Most research on homeschooling has been on non-representative samples of median-income white Americans, making it difficult for policymakers to accept its reliability. In addition, homeschoolers now include other ethnic groups and families with low socio-economic status, who existing research has largely ignored. We also know little about the families’ perceptions of barriers to homeschooling. In this paper, we address these gaps in homeschooling research by analyzing a state-representative sample of homeschooling families in Georgia belonging to a fragile community (e.g., household income $40,000 or less, disproportionately African American, children ages 2–18) recruited to the panel through randomized double-blind methods. Cross-sectional findings suggest that demographic variables do not explain much of the variation in homeschooling. Four perceived barriers stand out as significant negative predictors of both outcomes (i.e., now homeschooling and desire to homeschool). These barriers are parents not understanding homeschool laws, having various concerns about their children (e.g., concern social services agency may bother them if they homeschool), apprehensions about the socialization of their children, and unease about their own knowledge to homeschool. Findings suggest that policymakers should differentiate between the barriers to homeschooling faced by fragile families that do not already homeschool their children versus those that currently homeschool.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. Barna Group has conducted more than one million interviews over the course of hundreds of studies, while working with thousands of businesses, nonprofit organizations, and churches across the US and around the world. Some of its notable clients have included Habitat for Humanity, World Vision, Sony, Easter Seals, the American Bible Society, the Gates Foundation, and NBC Universal (www.barna.com/about/). Utilizing a sub-contractor such as Barna Group is beneficial because it mitigates bias in the data collection process, ensuring that sampling techniques and data processing did not influence results in favor of any researcher’s preconceived notions.