1,985
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Fusaric acid decreases p53 expression by altering promoter methylation and m6A RNA methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 79-91 | Received 13 Feb 2020, Accepted 02 Jun 2020, Published online: 07 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Fusaric acid (FA) is a food-borne mycotoxin that mediates toxicity with limited information on its epigenetic properties. p53 is a tumour suppressor protein that regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. The expression of p53 is regulated transcriptionally by promoter methylation and post-transcriptionally by N-6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation. We investigated the effect of FA on p53 expression and its epigenetic regulation via promoter methylation and m6A RNA methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells. HepG2 cells were treated with FA [0, 25, 50, 104, and 150 µg/ml; 24 h] and thereafter, DNA, RNA, and protein was isolated. Promoter methylation and expression of p53 was measured using qPCR and Western blot. RNA immuno-precipitation was used to determine m6A-p53 levels. The expression of m6A methyltransferases (METTL3 and METTL14), demethylases (FTO and ALKBH5), and readers (YTHDF1-3 and YTHDC2) were measured using qPCR. FA induced p53 promoter hypermethylation (p < 0.0001) and decreased p53 expression (p < 0.0001). FA decreased m6A-p53 levels (p < 0.0001) by decreasing METTL3 (p < 0.0001) and METTL14 (p < 0.0001); and suppressed expression of YTHDF1 (p < 0.0001), YTHDF3 (p < 0.0001), and YTHDC2 (p < 0.0001) that ultimately reduced p53 translation (p < 0.0001). Taken together, the data shows that FA epigenetically decreased p53 expression by altering its promoter methylation and m6A RNA methylation in HepG2 cells. This study reveals a mechanism for p53 regulation by FA and provides insight into future therapeutic interventions.

Author contributions

TG and AC conceptualized and designed the study. TG conducted all laboratory experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. SN and AC revised the manuscript. All authors have read the manuscript prior to submission.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Data availability

All datasets generated in this study are available in Supplementary Information and from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation [Grant no.: SFH160703175722] and the University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Health Sciences [Grant no.: 570869].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.