2,093
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Plasma methylated GNB4 and Riplet as a novel dual-marker panel for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2299044 | Received 02 Jun 2023, Accepted 19 Dec 2023, Published online: 28 Dec 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can greatly improve the survival rate of patients. We aimed to develop a novel marker panel based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation for the detection of HCC. The differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCs) specific for HCC blood diagnosis were selected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, then validated by the whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) of 12 paired HCC and paracancerous tissues. The clinical performance of the panel was evaluated using tissue samples [32 HCC, chronic liver disease (CLD), and healthy individuals] and plasma cohorts (173 HCC, 199 CLD, and 98 healthy individuals). The combination of G protein subunit beta 4 (GNB4) and Riplet had the optimal area under the curve (AUC) in seven candidates through TCGA, GEO, and WGBS analyses. In tissue validation, the GNB4 and Riplet showed an AUC of 100% with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for detecting any-stage HCC. In plasma, it demonstrated a high sensitivity of 84.39% at 91.92% specificity, with an AUC of 92.51% for detecting any-stage HCC. The dual-marker panel had a higher sensitivity of 78.26% for stage I HCC than alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) of 47.83%, and a high sensitivity of 70.27% for detecting a single tumour (size ≤3 cm). In conclusion, we developed a novel dual-marker panel that demonstrates high accuracy in detecting HCC, surpassing the performance of AFP testing.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants in our study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’contributions

QKY and SCW designed the research and wrote the manuscript; YTZ and LZ performed research and data analysis; HFJ, YX, and LHC collected clinical samples and sorted data; WZ, LLD, LLZ, YH, and KKW contributed to the reagents, technical assistance, and bioinformatics analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (2022-KY-0631-002). All human samples and clinical data were collected in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Each participant signed an informed consent form for the use of their tissues and blood samples.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2023.2299044.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project under Grant [232102310028].