Article title: MEG reveals preference specific increases of sexual-image-evoked responses in paedophilic sexual offenders and healthy controls
Authors: Krylova, M., Ristow, I., Marr, V., Borchardt, V., Li, M., Witzel, J., Drumkova, K., Harris, J. A., Zacharias, N., Schiltz, K., Amelung, T., Beier, K. M., Kruger, T. H. C., Ponseti, J., Schiffer, B., Walter, H., Kärgel, C., & Walter, M.
Journal: The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2020.1789216
When this article was first published online the caption for Figure 3 was incorrect.
The correct caption for Figure 3 is as follows:
Figure 3. Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) responses for left (panel A) and right (panel B) parieto-occipital channel group. Left: Grand average mismatch negativity responses for HC (solid lines) and P + CSO (dashed lines). Grey represents the latency range that was used for calculations. Right: Box plots representing magnitude and latency of the mismatch negativity for HC and P + CSO. Each dot indicates data of one subject. Stars correspond to the significance levels (p < .001 = ***, .01 < p < .05 = *).
This error has been corrected in both online and print versions of the article.