![Sample our Built Environment journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5926/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Built-Environment.jpg"})
Abstract
Although building information modelling (BIM) applies widely in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry, its systematic implementation in AEC projects still experiences challenges. While most previous studies have investigated general BIM implementation, the present study precisely focuses on the barriers to BIM implementation at the AEC project level and explores their sources in the Chinese project context. Based on a questionnaire survey with 166 valid responses from experienced BIM practitioners as empirical evidence from the Chinese construction context, the data were processed using descriptive statistical analysis, non-parametric analysis and principal component analysis. The results of the descriptive analysis classified 14 critical barriers. The international comparison of the top five barriers indicated that the most critical barriers were similar but ranked differently in different countries. The following principal component analysis revealed six underlying factors for all the barriers, which were experience and capabilities, technical conditions, system inertia, extra input, change of work routines, and implementation risks. The findings of this study may help the practitioners to understand BIM implementation barriers, allocate resources, and prioritize efforts in project practices. This study can also provide implications for BIM deployment and governance in the AEC industry.
Data availability statement
Data of this study can be accessed from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank The Hong Kong Jockey Club and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding this research. The authors wish to thank Prof. HUANG Qiang and Prof. CHENG Zhijun from China BIM Union for supporting the data collection in the survey. The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Disclosure statement
There is no potential conflict of interest reported by the authors.