![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
Sediment management is frequently the most challenging concern in dam removal but there is as yet little guidance available to resource managers. For those rivers with beds composed primarily of non‐cohesive sediments, we document recent numerical and physical modelling of two processes critical to evaluating the effects of dam removal: the morphologic response to a sediment pulse, and the infiltration of fine sediment into coarser bed material. We demonstrate that (1) one‐dimensional numerical modelling of sediment pulses can simulate reach‐averaged transport and deposition over tens of kilometres, with sufficient certainty for managers to make informed decisions; (2) physical modelling of a coarse sediment pulse moving through an armoured pool‐bar complex shows deposition in pool tails and along bar margins while maintaining channel complexity and pool depth similar to pre‐pulse conditions; (3) physical modelling and theoretical analysis show that fine sediment will infiltrate into an immobile coarse channel bed to only a few median bed material particle diameters. We develop a generic approach to sediment management during dam removal using our experimental understanding to guide baseline data requirements, likely environmental constraints, and alternative removal strategies. In uncontaminated, non‐cohesive reservoir sediments we conclude that the management impacts of rapid sediment release may be of limited magnitude in many situations, and so the choice of dam removal strategy merits site‐specific evaluation of the environmental impacts associated with a full range of alternatives.
