![Sample our Built Environment journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5926/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Built-Environment.jpg"})
Abstract
In the Midwestern USA, bank erosion is a common hazard due to the high erodibility of the bank soils. In this paper, an improved methodology aimed at identifying the optimal countermeasures to control bank erosion was developed and applied in two sites of the Des Moines River (USA). In situ flow measurements, bed bathymetry and soil properties were collected for providing boundary conditions and parameters of the two-dimensional, depth-averaged hydrodynamic finite element surface water modeling system (FESWMS) model. The model was used to compare the hydraulic performances of four streambank countermeasures: riprap lining (referred to as S1); a series of barbs (S2); alternating barbs and spurs (S3); and the combination of barbs with lining (S4). A key feature of FESWMS was its ability to simulate the wetting/drying conditions of mesh elements, which allowed the simulations of unsubmerged or partially submerged structures for different hydraulic conditions. This research showed that the combination of alternating barbs and spurs (S3) was the only design which provided protection during overbank flows at a competitive cost compared to the other designs analysed. The uniqueness of this methodology is found in the coupling of field measurements and theoretical approaches for depth-averaged velocity profiles to calibrate and validate a hydrodynamic model; and in the proposed design to protect streambanks from severe erosion.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr Trevis Huff former IIHR Engineer I for his support with practical aspects of the project, Dr Mohamed Elhakeem, Assistant Professor at the Abu Dhabi University for his help with the model FESWMS, and Tommy Sutarto for his help with aspects of the size distribution analysis. Funding for this research was provided by the Van Buren County Engineering office and the help provided by Engineer David L. Barrett has been instrumental towards the completion of the project. On and all, the revised manuscript has been drastically improved due to the comments provided by the three anonymous reviewers and the editor.