Publication Cover
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance
Volume 19, 2023 - Issue 11
307
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A cause-based defect ranking approach for existing concrete bridges using Analytic Hierarchy Process and fuzzy-TOPSIS

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 1555-1567 | Received 11 Jun 2021, Accepted 26 Nov 2021, Published online: 04 Feb 2022
 

Abstract

Condition assessment is a crucial step in maintaining and managing existing concrete bridges. Most of the studies consider defects and their severity levels in the evaluation process in the literature. As of now, underlying causes, which play an important role in magnifying existing defects, do not get much attention in the assessment process as per the literature. Thus, this study proposes an integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy-Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (fuzzy-TOPSIS) approach to rank defects considering underlying causes. Here, causes and sub-causes are considered as criteria and sub-criteria, respectively. AHP is used to determine relative importance weights of causes and sub-causes. The final defects ranking is obtained using fuzzy-TOSIS. The applicability of the model is demonstrated through a case study on a reinforced concrete bridge deck in Gujarat, India, where ‘cracks’ is obtained as the most critical defect for this specific case. The robustness of the model is examined by a sensitivity analysis. The proposed approach can help bridge owners to enhance the existing decision-making process of concrete bridges. Moreover, this approach can be considered as a first step into a new way of ranking defects of a more comprehensive system.

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge IDDC Engineers Pvt. Ltd. for providing support and inspection data for this research work. The authors really grateful to Professor Yiannis Tsompanakis (Technical Editor), Professor Hithoshi Furuta (Managing Editor) and three anonymous reviewers for the insightful and constructive comments which make valuable improvements to our manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.