2,919
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A human rights-based framework to assess gender equality in health systems: the example of Zika virus in the Americas

&
Article: 1570645 | Received 31 Jan 2018, Accepted 03 Jan 2019, Published online: 20 Mar 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: The right to health was enshrined in the constitution of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1946 and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. The latter Declaration, which also guaranteed women’s rights, was signed by almost all countries in the world. Subsequent international conventions reinforced these rights, requiring that women be able to realize their fundamental freedoms and dignity. Although the value of incorporating gender into health systems has been increasingly acknowledged over the years, gender inequalities in health persist.

Objective: To introduce a tool to help countries assess their performance in addressing gender inequalities in their health systems, using the example of the Zika virus (ZIKV) in countries of the Americas.

Methods: This paper is based on comprehensive reviews of the literature on the links between gender equality, health systems and human rights, and available scientific evidence about an adequate response to ZIKV.

Results: The authors present a simple two-part framework from the human rights perspectives of the health system as duty bearer, incorporating WHO’s six health system building blocks, and of its clients as rights holders. The authors apply the framework to ZIKV in the Americas, and identify strengths and weaknesses at every level of the health system. They find that when considering gender, health systems have focused mainly on dichotomous sex differences, failing to consider broader gender relations and processes affecting access to services, quality of care, and health outcomes.

Conclusions: The authors’ framework will permit countries to assess progress toward gender equality in health, within the context of their human rights commitments, by examining each health system building block, and the degree to which clients are realizing their rights. By applying the framework to specific health conditions, gender-related achievements and shortcomings can be identified in each health system component, fostering a more comprehensive and gender-sensitive response.

Responsible editor Isabel Goicolea, Umeå University, Sweden

Responsible editor Isabel Goicolea, Umeå University, Sweden

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the feedback from participants at the 9th European Congress on Tropical Medicine and International Health, in which the some of the early ideas for this paper were presented in a keynote address. The final paper has benefited from these, as well as input on the human rights perspective from Sandeep Prasad, executive director of Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights.

 Author contributions

Carol Vlassoff contributed the gender equality and human rights intellectual content of this manuscript, while Ronald St. John contributed its scientific content on ZIKV. Both authors contributed to the development of the framework and to the drafting, critical revision and interpretation of the information, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethics and consent

This paper does not require ethical clearance or consent as it is based entirely on material from secondary published sources and the authors’ own insights and experience.

Paper context

A common finding of gender-related health research is that gender inequalities prevail in health systems worldwide. Existing tools to incorporate gender into health systems are complex and little used. New, simpler approaches, more intuitive for health workers and applicable to different health conditions and at different levels of the system, are needed. Our framework responds to this need, building on the growing awareness of human rights obligations in health and WHO’s health system building blocks.

Additional information

Funding

No funding from external sources was received for this research or manuscript preparation.