https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-9323
ABSTRACT
Background: Credible data and indicators are necessary for country-specific evidence to support the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation.
Objective: A cross-country analysis was undertaken in seven Sub-Saharan African countries to describe the potential role of available data in strengthening SSB taxation. The objectives were to: document currently available data sources; report on public access; discuss strengths and limitations for use in monitoring SSB taxation; describe policy maker's data needs, and propose improvements in data collection.
Methods: The study used a mixed-methods approach involving a secondary data analysis of publicly available documents, and a qualitative exploration of the data needs of policy makers’ using primary data. Findings were synthesised and assessed for data strengths and weaknesses, including usability and availability. SSB taxation-related data availability was critically assessed with respect to adequacy in strengthening taxation policy on SSBs.
Results: Findings showed a paucity of SSB taxation-related data in all seven countries. National survey data are inadequate regarding the intake of SSBs and household expenditure on SSBs. Fiscal data from SSB tax revenue, value added tax from SSB sales, corporate income tax from SSB companies and SSB custom duty revenues, are lacking. Accurate information on the soft drink industry is not easily accessed.
Conclusion: Timely, easily understood, concise, and locally relevant evidence is needed in order to inform policy development on SSBs. The relevant data are drawn from multiple sectors. Cross- sector collaboration is therefore needed. Indicators for SSBs should be developed and included in current data collection tools to ensure monitoring and evaluation for SSB taxation.
Responsible Editor:
Background
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for an estimated 40.5 million (71%) of the 56.9 million deaths worldwide, with the majority occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [Citation1]. Increasing prevention and control of NCDs is of particular importance in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [Citation2].
In 2017, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high body-mass index (BMI) and dietary risks accounted for the greatest health losses from NCDs for both men and women in SSA [Citation2]. Dietary risk factors contributed to 13 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs) and 489,000 deaths in SSA, of which 139,000 DALYs and 3,000 deaths were attributable to high consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) [Citation3]. In 2017, the consumption of SSBs (49 grams per day) was almost twenty times higher than the optimal level of intake (3grams per day) across the whole of the SSA region [Citation4]. With strong evidence about the adverse health effects of SSBs on population health [Citation5], the taxation of SSBs has been identified as an entry point for creating healthier food environments [Citation6]. The use of SSB taxation as a lever to improve population health and its efficacy as a tool to curb obesity, is often contested by the food and beverage industry. A growing body of literature on nutrition policies including SSB taxation, describes the critical role of data availability in increasing political and public support in policy implementation [Citation7–9]. For example, in South Africa, strong local evidence and data demonstrating the potential impact of a 20% SSB tax on obesity was instrumental in supporting advocacy efforts and creating sustained political commitment for the adoption of a SSB tax [Citation10].
An increasing number of LMICs are considering the implementation of SSB taxation or optimizing existing measures to align these with the global best-practice recommendation of 20% that would generate meaningful changes in consumption [Citation11,Citation12]. However a number of LMICs lack the confidence to act on SSBs in part due to the lack of reliable local and timely data on the effectiveness of such tax [Citation13].
This article aims to describe the data availability and its potential role in strengthening SSB taxation in seven SSA countries. The objectives were to: document currently available data sources; report on public access; discuss strengths and limitations for use in monitoring SSB taxation; describe policy makers’ data needs and propose improvements in data collection.
Methodology
Study design and setting
This study has a mixed-methods design involving a secondary data analysis of publicly available documents, and a qualitative exploration of the data needs of policy makers using primary data. This is part of a larger research project, Readiness to Adopt Inter-sectoral Non-Communicable Disease Prevention Policies in a Subset of Southern and East African Countries: A Landscape Analysis [Citation14]. The study reported in this paper was undertaken in Botswana, Kenya, Namibia, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia with the primary research question: What are the potential opportunities and challenges to strengthen SSB taxation-related policies? The research question is addressed by identifying relevant data and assessing data availability related to SSB taxation in these seven countries.
Data collection
The research team collaboratively identified relevant indicators based on 1) the nature of SSB consumption as a health problem (i.e., indicators relevant to diet and health) and 2) the context of SSBs as a consumer good (i.e., related to supply chains). We consulted the broader literature on the theory of change of how SSB taxation can influence health [Citation15,Citation16] and how it can lead to additional outcomes that result directly from the tax ().
Figure 1. Summary of potential outcomes of SSB taxation. Adapted from Mytton, Eyles & Ogilvie, 2014 [Citation15]
![Figure 1. Summary of potential outcomes of SSB taxation. Adapted from Mytton, Eyles & Ogilvie, 2014 [Citation15]](/cms/asset/b4774deb-e5b1-4239-a64a-32b5aa9c46d5/zgha_a_1871189_f0001_b.gif)
For each potential effect of SSB taxation we brainstormed indicators that can be effective measurement tools. We organized them into the following groups: health, anthropometry, food, diet, economic, fiscal, employment specific indicators, and sociodemographic variables. Gender-sensitive data were also collected where available.
The secondary data analysis was undertaken between October 2018 and March 2019 to document currently available data sources, to report on their public availability, and to discuss data limitations and strengths. We searched for publicly available documents including surveys and routine data collection systems at national and certain sub-national levels with relevance for monitoring the impact of SSB taxation. Data sources included ministry reports (Health, Trade, Commerce, Agriculture, Education, Finance/budget statements), publications from government statistics offices, the World Bank, the World Health Organization (WHO) and other development partners such as the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Researchers also looked for data at The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program website [https://dhsprogram.com/] and DataFirst [https://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/] online data repository. In order to obtain industry relevant data, Fitch Solution [Citation17] reports were purchased. These reports specifically deal with the food and drink markets in Botswana, Zambia, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. No report of this type was available for Rwanda.
To understand the data needs of policy makers, primary data were collected through 39 key stakeholder interviews (KSI) conducted between October 2018 and April 2019 in four of the seven countries (10 interviews in Kenya, 10 in Zambia, 13 in Namibia and 6 in Botswana). Researchers (MM, HA, GA, LG) developed a stakeholder analysis matrix based on the recommendations of Varvasovsky and Brugha[Citation18] . Stakeholders were selected based on 1) the desk-based policy content analysis, 2) the desk-based stakeholder analysis components of the parent research project. Stakeholders invited for a one-on-one interview included representatives from government agencies including health, commerce, development, agriculture, education; academia; soft drink manufacturers; and civil society actors (). Interviews were conducted by an experienced English language researcher. A semi-structured interview schedule was used as a guide. Among other issues, questions focused on the type and adequacy of data to support SSB taxation. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim into English.
Table 1. Key stakeholder description
Data analysis
Data availability landscape
Relevant data sources were assessed according to their strengths and weaknesses, including usability and availability, furthermore their characteristics including frequency of data collection, and geographical coverage. A standardised data collection template was developed on Microsoft Excel™ to facilitate data collection across the seven research sites. Thereafter, data were compared and synthesised during a workshop held in Johannesburg in South Africa in March 2019, involving researchers from each of the seven countries.
Analysis of key stakeholder interviews
Interview transcripts were read multiple times by two researchers in order to immerse in the content and flow of the discussion. Thereafter, transcripts were coded using a qualitative analysis tool – Nvivo version 12. The first round of the coding process was guided by objective three, to describe data needs of policy makers. The following codes were used in the analysis: data as a barrier, data to drive policy, data from other countries, data for monitoring and evaluation, data type, and local data. Thereafter, themes were identified through a deductive, data-driven coding approach, while the analysis took an inductive form simultaneously reflecting on the answers given to the research questions. Reporting of the findings adheres to COREQ guidelines DHS data primarily[Citation19] .
Integrated analysis
Given the mixed-methods nature of our study, we integrated findings from across the data sets. We examined findings for convergence and contradiction to develop a coherent and cross-validated picture of data availability in the context of SSB taxation. By comparing these sources, we identified gaps in data availability and proposed improvements to data collection accordingly. This integration took place after the data analysis was completed.
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval for conducting interviews was granted at each site. Ethical clearance was obtained by the Amref Health Africa – Ethical and Scientific Review Committee (Amref-ESRC- ESRC) in Kenya, the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Namibia, ERES Converge in Zambia, and Ministry of Health in Botswana.
Results
Data availability landscape
Existence of current surveys
Surveys are widely used data sources among researchers [Citation20]. Survey data are imperative for robust analysis and to build knowledge base which is then made available to policy and programmatic decision-makers.
summarises the availabile surveys in the study countries. The principal source of data on the NCD burden and associated risk factors is the WHO STEPwise approach to Surveillance (STEPS) [Citation21]. STEPS, which was initiated in 2002, collects comparable information across countries on NCDs. These data are available in five of the seven countries. However, STEPS data are older than eight years in Tanzania (conducted in 2012). In Rwanda and Namibia where STEPS data are unavailable, the WHO NCD Country Profile consolidates data from several sources.
Table 2. Summary of the latest available country data for national assessment data indicators
All seven countries collect national population-based data using DHS Surveys. However, the most recent Namibian and Zambian DHS reports are older than five years and Botswana conducted only one DHS in 1988. The latest Botswana Demographic Survey, conducted in 2017, does provide information on certain health indicators. DHS data primarily focus on health and is the most detailed source of local health data. The DHS surveys are also the principal source of data on nutrition-specific indicators including anthropometric measures and data on child feeding practices across all countries.
Routine surveillance is undertaken by the District Health Information Systems (DHISs) in all seven countries. The DHIS includes a number of NCD-related indicators such as diabetes, hypertension, mental health, dental health, cataract surgery and cervical cancer screening. The current DHIS data are not population based. They capture only those who seek care in the public sector.
Other surveys that provide data on food-related indicators (i.e., food consumption, food security) at a national-level are conducted on households. outlines the availability of these and other data sources across countries. Across the countries, only Rwanda has district-level data in its Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey and the DHS. In the other six countries, the lowest-level of data available is at provincial-level. Among all surveillance tools, household surveys are conducted the most frequently, but their dependence on self-reported data makes these a limited source of health data. Data from surveys with a primary focus on nutrition were available in Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda, Namibia and Zambia. National nutritional surveys were unavailable in Uganda and Botswana.
Country-level data relevant to food and beverages include food balance data collected by the FAO in all seven countries [Citation22]. The latest data (2013) compiled by FAOSTAT provide measures on the total per-capita annual availability of particular foods for human consumption such as sugar, non-alcoholic beverages and fruit juices, taking into consideration agricultural production, imports, and exports in each country.
Regarding the soft drink industry data, annual reports and the media (both printed and digital) are provided free of charge, but there is limited information on products content, sales, and price. Alternative sources for industry information include independent data providers such as Euromonitor International and Fitch Solutions [Citation17]. However, these independent data providers charge for their data and did not have industry information available in all of the seven countries studied here.
What is being monitored?
All countries have some nationally representative data on the prevalence of NCDs and survey data on nutrition status indicators from DHS. Core nutrition related anthropometric indicators monitored in all countries include BMI, stunting, wasting, raised blood pressure, overweight/obesity, raised blood glucose, raised cholesterol, and micronutrient deficiency. Importantly, the data are disaggregated by gender and age. A nutrition-relevant but under reported indicator is dental health, which was only monitored in Botswana and Zambia at the time of data collection (2019). Monitoring of other nutrition-related NCD indicators varies in scope across countries and even across surveys within a country depending on the primary objective of the survey. The nutritional focus of the surveys is dominated by questions around household food insecurity, dietary diversity, vitamin supplementation, breastfeeding, and infant and child feeding practices. Target populations of surveys are often restricted to the dietary patterns and health and nutrition outcomes of children 6–59 months of age and women of reproductive age 15–49 years old. This is the same for the Zambia Food Consumption and Micronutrient Survey and DHS data in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia.
provides a detailed summary of the indicators relevant to SSB taxation that are captured by existing surveys in the respective countries. For an extended list of nutrition-related NCD indicators please see Appendix A.
Table 3. Summary of the availability of indicators in the studied countries that are relevant to support the formulation, implementation and evaluation of SSBs taxation
At an aggregate level, dietary risk factors that are monitored include fruit and vegetable intake, salt, sugar, meat, dairy products, and alcohol consumption. Data on non-alcoholic beverages (non-SSB specific) are available in Uganda, Tanzania, Zambia, and Kenya. The surveys often cluster a number of different items together ranging from soft drink, bottled/canned soda, juice, non-milk liquids and water. The DHS surveys in all countries assembled particular food types together. For example, non-milk liquids were grouped together when collecting data on child-feeding practices. Similarly, Tanzania’s national nutrition survey asks participants about purchasing and consuming any of the beverages listed, including SSBs and non-sugary beverages alike:
Any sodas or other sweet drinks, like Azam, Pepsi, Twist, local herbs, gripe water, clear tea with no milk, black coffee, togwa [traditional non-alcoholic beverage] (National Nutrition Survey, 2014, Tanzania).
Similar methods of categorisation were observed in other surveys in Tanzania, including the Household Budget Survey (2011/12) that provides household expenditure data on a sub-group of drinks that groups mineral waters, soft drinks, fruit and vegetable juices together; and the National Panel Survey (2014/15) that provides price data per kilogram for bottled/canned soft drinks, soda, juice, and water. The price of and expenditure on SSBs are also not disaggregated from non-sugary drinks in Kenya’s Integrated Household Budget Survey (2015/16). Here cost data are only available for non-alcoholic beverages in general. Rwanda’s Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey (2016/17) is the only tool that captures the share of household spending on carbonated soft drinks as a single item. Additional relevant items included in that survey included juices (local and imported), candy/gum, chocolate, powdered juices and drinking chocolate, sugar (local and imported).
Out of the seven SSA countries, only Kenya’s PMA2020 nutrition survey includes a recently added a specific question about the consumption of SSBs among women 10–49 years of age and children 6–59 months of age. An evaluation conducted on the survey found the question to be feasible and suggested that it should be included in nation-wide population-based surveys [Citation23]. The PMA2020 as well as the surveys in Tanzania and Rwanda includes questions about diet (i.e., sweet and savoury/fried snacks consumption) that are not commonly measured in nationally representative household surveys.
Data needs of key stakeholders
Results from the key stakeholder interviews are presented in alignment with four themes that emerged from the analysis: 1) context-specific NCD profiles, 2) sugar and SSB consumption data, 3) economic data, and 4) intervention effectiveness. Under each theme, results are supported by illustrative quotes.
Context-specific NCD profiles
Local evidence generation on priority nutrition-related NCDs and drivers was perceived necessary for policy formulation amongst key stakeholders.
If you don’t have evidence, the people who need to make the change are not going to make the change that you need. (KSI, Kenya, policy maker)
There was a strong reliance on external surveys conducted by outside agencies rather than on internal data, which raised concerns among stakeholders regarding the applicability of the data to local context. A policy maker in Botswana emphasised the need to identify local drivers of NCDs to inform how best to adapt generalised, international best practice to local contexts and target true drivers of NCDs.
We need enough data on the real causes of NCDs in Botswana. Internationally or globally one of the main contributing factors of obesity - also linked to NCDs - is sugar intake. However, the same cannot be assumed for Botswana without adequate evidence. (KSI, Botswana, dietician)
Similarly, in Kenya a concern was expressed regarding how the calorie dense nature of local diets may not be captured by the standardized global NCD surveys.
We have a big problem of content. Our food now is very calorie dense. Then we have another challenge when we talk about NCDs, [the] combination of our diet, very few vegetables and fruits and so we have a lot of starch and protein. (KSI, Kenya, policy maker)
Interviewees unanimously recommended introducing monitoring and data collection aimed at better understanding local diets and context-specific foods and beverages. For example, in Zambia, six of the ten interviewees believed that Nshima, a common processed mealie-based breakfast food, might contribute to NCDs. In Namibia, a stakeholder expressed concern over the high sugar content of home brewed beverages. A participant from the government sector in Botswana spoke more generally about indigenous and locally produced foodstuff and the need to better monitor and evaluate these health impacts.
Furthermore, stakeholders believed that data disaggregated by district, as opposed to current national or provincial-levels, would allow the identification of hot spots for particular public health attention. One interviewee from Namibia described the different dietary habits across the counnationaltry, variation that might not be captured in great depth by existing surveys.
If we start from the North, we have mostly people who are emphasizing on meat derived products. In the northeast, there’s more focus on wild edible food like fruits and vegetables together with the game meat. If we come to the more advanced and industrial society in the central regions in Namibia, we find most of the people focus on the industrialised or value-added foods maybe purchased from supermarkets. (KSI, Namibia, Researcher)
Sugar and SSB consumption data
When asked about the type of evidence needed for the successful implementation of a tax on SSBs, interviewees hoped for high-quality data on the amount of sugar consumed per capita and the amount of sugar in particular foods.
We need evidence on diet habits of the population and then based on the evidence we will also establish that indeed there is a higher consumption of sweetened foods or higher consumption of sugary foods or higher consumption of fatty foods. (KSI, Namibia, civil society)
Baseline in terms of nutrition we have, but in terms of how much sugar, because we say that coca cola has this sugar but because we have never had evidence. […] The ready-made products even from supermarket even the cereals we don’t have evidence of sugars and salts that go in. (KSI, Kenya, policy maker)
Demographic information of consumers was also highlighted as being important data for policy makers. When asked about national-level data deficits with regards to nutrition, interviewees indicated that men and the adult population were less represented in the survey data.
Research is really lacking, most of the research is on under-fives, pregnant women but very few on adults. (KSI, Botswana, dietician)
Beyond age and gender, some interviewees identified the value for policy making of having data on socio-economic status and consumers` motivation for their food and drink choices.
Who are the consumers of the same drinks we are talking about? The people who are in danger, the elite: the people who went to school, the middle class? (KSI, Zambia, policy maker)
What type of food do they have even as related to their income etc. and the consumption of sugar and the type of food they eat and the reason why they are eating such foods, is it lifestyle, is it health, is it culture. (KSI, Namibia, policy maker)
Economic data
Stakeholders emphasised the need for SSB-related fiscal evidence to compare the cost and the potential benefits of the proposed SSB tax. Equally, economic evidence was perceived to be key for the evaluation of any current or potential tax and its augmentation.
The research would be to bring out the economic cost and say how much do we lose, how much do we gain. How much of tax are we gaining vis-à-vis how much are we using from these diseases. And also to look at the cost of putting the tax. […] How much revenue do you gain as a government, how much reduction of consumption, how much does it affect the work industry. (KSI, Kenya, policy maker)
Some also noted that information on the soft drink industry would be useful for policy making, and balancing health and economic priorities. For example, one participant raised the question ‘how many factories do we have in the country’ (KSI, Namibia, policy maker). Furthermore, obtaining accurate information on the price of foods and product content, emerged as an important discussion point.
Intervention effectiveness
One interviewee furthered the discussion by calling for evidence with nation-wide geographical coverage and longitudinal time. This was perceived to be important for the development and implementation of a SSB tax.
You need proven evidence. When the UK introduced [a policy on SSBs], they done a study for 25 years. They looked at several parameters after that they said no, not anymore, then it [a policy on SSBs] was introduced and approved by the parliament. (KSI, Namibia, researcher)
Similar country examples of successful implementation of SSB taxation were deemed invaluable by interviewees claiming that ‘it would also be interesting for the policy makers to understand what is happening in other countries so that they could extrapolate and see how it is going to benefit our own local population’ (KSI, Kenya, policy maker). However, there was uncertainty about the transferability of evidence from other countries. Therefore, interviewees called for local evidence generation.
To introduce tax based mechanism to reduce the consumption, I think clinically based proven studies with big number of case studies that is to be considered, maybe from different regions in Namibia to be introduced from the Ministry of Health together with the Ministry of industry and trade or then to be taken to the cabinet in Namibia to highlight […] that we are getting lots of patients and this is killing our people (KSI, Namibia, researcher)
Similarly, in Botswana, a dietician acknowledged that a SSB tax ‘is an international recommendation but for Botswana I don’t think it’s adequate’ and called for local evidence generation in the form of a pilot study to provide an evidence base for a tax proposal on SSBs.
Integrated analysis of gaps and opportunities
By using both secondary data analysis and qualitative methods this study sought to provide a cross-validated picture of data availability for the successful monitoring and evaluation of SSB taxation in seven SSA countries.
Our findings highlight a data deficit in the following areas: SSB consumption and purchasing behaviour, economics, and industry matters. Sociodemographic variables cut across all of these areas. We found minimal sugar consumption data at the individual-level. Neither the national surveys, nor the DHS or FAO explicitly assess the consumption of SSBs. There is also a dearth of household-level expenditure data on SSBs. Yet these are necessary indicators for making estimates of consumption estimates and formulating policy. We found very little SSB fiscal data or publicly available information on industry trade and sales volumes. Although annual industry reports do exist, they are not easily accessible for the general public.
Findings from the secondary analysis and stakeholder interviews highlighted significant data gaps in relation to age and gender. Most of the nutrition data collected to date has been for children aged under-two and for women of reproductive age. Groups that were less represented included children aged 5–9 and 10–14 years and men in general. Furthermore, differences between urban and rural residents, richer and poorer groups were not documented.
Discussion
The current data landscape in these seven countries provides only a snapshot of nutrition-related NCD risk factors and offers little data to support the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of SSB taxation in SSA.
The deficits of current nutrition-related indicators in large-scale household and facility surveys have also emerged as a recent concern in global health circles. In 2018, an international technical consultation on monitoring nutrition-related NCDs, highlighted the urgent need for new indicators on unhealthy diets, including SSB consumption [Citation24]. More recently, a review of data availability on children’s diets highlighted large data gaps in LMICs regarding unhealthy dietary practices across all age groups [Citation25]. The review’s recommendations resonated with that of the 2018 technical consultation report [Citation24] and also our study findings – to strengthen standardized, nationally representative individual-level dietary and food consumption data, including SSB intake. In the absence of such evidence, countries might underestimate the true magnitude of SSB consumption. Evidence that reflects sociodemographic differences is also imperative for policy implementation and evaluation. Sociodemographic data can help inform researchers about the economic regressivity of taxation policies and can assist in evaluating the effects of pricing on consumer behaviour. Coherent economic arguments must also be used as a part of a comprehensive approach to discuss SSB taxes within policy circles. Key stakeholders unanimously underscored the importance of such evidence that policy makers need to take into account.
While no consensus has been reached to date around how best to capture data for new indicators [Citation24], a useful point of departure would be to complement existing data sources, including population-based surveys with SSB taxation-related questions. This would lead to improvement in tracking SSB intake and the effectiveness of SSB taxation. Surveys like the DHS could include specific questions on SSB and added sugar consumption, while GHS and National Income Dynamics Studies could include questions around SSB spending. However, household surveys and their modification are costly and would require investments. National nutrition surveys in Burkina Faso and Tanzania can cost between 25–45 USD per household, 15–23,000 USD per stratum per year respectively [Citation24]. National Departments of Health should allocate funds to improve data surveillance processes and convene relevant stakeholders, including data producing agencies and local research groups, with the aim of synchronising data sources. This is necessary, as data are often held across various sectors e.g. economic, labour and health, and by government and non-governmental organizations as well as by various parts of food and beverage industries. A growing body of literature on multi-sectoral public health policy suggest that successful interventions require a collaborative approach to gather evidence [Citation26–28]. In order to achieve this, all relevant sectors should coordinate their efforts. Transparent and collaborative efforts would enable the most efficient use of various data sources.
Strength and limitations
This analysis fills a gap, for the first time, in the data available regarding SSB consumption and taxation in Sub-Saharan Africa. The analysis has a few limitations, however. First, key stakeholder interviews were only conducted in four of the seven countries due to budget constraints. Nevertheless, stakeholder interviews provided indicative evidence on the type of evidence they require for strengthening SSB taxation. Second, the desk review relied heavily on publicly available online material, thus recent unpublished data might have been excluded. To ensure that all key data sources have been included in our analysis, stakeholder interviews served as means of verification. This study represents a first step towards global benchmarking of SSB taxation-related data against which countries can compare their progress in improving data availability.
Conclusion
Diets in SSA are transitioning as countries advance from low-income to middle-income status. It is timely to adopt preventive measures to curtail the growing NCD epidemic. One important area of focus is the SSA food and beverage space. Currently SSA is being promoted as a ‘growth market’ by the food and beverage industry. Fiscal policies, such as SSB taxation could have substantial health benefits in the long term. Yet they are one policy lever in a series of steps that is needed to address population health and obesity prevention. The potential health and economic benefits of such tax as well as the monitoring and evaluation of its implementation will require appropriate data and indicators within and beyond the health sector. The establishment of robust accurate baseline data to inform evidence will enable governments to accelerate political and public support for SSB taxation and related policies.
Authors’ contribution
Conceptualization: KH, SAK, AE, AMT. Participated in the data collection and analysis: MNW, CR, GA, GA, HA, LG, MM, TN. Drafted the manuscript: AE. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript for submission.
Ethics and consent
All interviews conducted were subject to human research ethics approvals, from the relevant in-country ethics committee.
Paper context
In the face of the high non-communicable disease burden across Sub-Saharan Africa, sugar-sweetened beverage taxation could have substantial health and economic benefits. Its success requires credible data to inform a strong evidence base. This study enhances the understanding of data availability and missing information required for strengthening sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in Botswana, Kenya, Namibia, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. This study contributes to knowledge of appropriate design, successful implementation and evaluation of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation across Sub-Saharan Africa.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the study participants and those consulted in all countries for their invaluable contributions to this research.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Bennett JE, Stevens GA, Mathers CD, et al. NCD countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards sustainable development goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392:1072–13.
- Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392:1923–1994.
- Global Health Data Exchange | GHDx. [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 4]. Available from: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/
- Afshin A, Sur PJ, Fay KA, et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393:1958–1972.
- Malik VS, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: an update of the evidence. Nutrients. 2019 Aug;11:1840.
- World Health Organization. Taxes on sugary drinks: why do it? [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260253
- Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Gervais S, et al. Nutrition agenda setting, policy formulation and implementation: lessons from the mainstreaming nutrition initiative. Health Policy Plan. 2012 Jan 1;27:19–31.
- Baker P, Hawkes C, Wingrove K, et al. What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the united nations decade of action on nutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 1;3:e000485.
- World Cancer Research Fund International. Building momentum: lessons on implementing a robust sugar sweetened beverage tax. 2018;36.
- Manyema M, Veerman LJ, Chola L, et al. The potential impact of a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity in South African adults: a mathematical model. Plos One. 2014 Aug 19;9:e105287.
- World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases: technical meeting report, 5–6 May 2015. Geneva, Switzerland [Internet]: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250131/1/9789241511247-eng.pdf?ua=1
- NOURISHING database [Internet]. World cancer research fund. 2016. [cited 2019 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-database
- Holmes MD, Dalal S, Volmink J, et al. Non-communicable diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case for cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2010 May 11;7:e1000244.
- Thow A, Erzse A, Asiki G, et al. Study design: policy landscape analysis for sugar-sweetened beverage taxation in seven sub-Saharan African countries. 2021;14(1).
- Mytton OT, Eyles H, Ogilvie D. Evaluating the health impacts of food and beverage taxes. Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Dec 1;3:432–439.
- Saxena A, Stacey N, Puech PDR, et al. The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 1;4:e001317.
- South Africa market analysis : fitch solutions [Internet]. Fitch Solutions. 2019. [cited 2019 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.fitchsolutions.com/topic/south-africa
- Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep 1;15:239–246.
- Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec 1;19:349–357.
- Fabic M, Choi Y, Bird S. A systematic review of demographic and health surveys: data availability and utilization for research. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:604–612.
- STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) [Internet]. World Health Organization. [cited 2019 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/en/
- Food balance sheets [Internet]. Food and agribulture organization of the united nations. 2013. [cited 2019 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS
- PMA2020 nutrition survey - urkina Faso and Kenya: measurement innovations report [Internet]. Bill & Melinda Gates institute for population and reproductive health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg school of public health. 2019. Available from: https://www.pma2020.org/sites/default/files/Nuturion_Measurement_Innovations_DIGITAL.pdf
- Technical consultation on measuring nutrition in population-based household surveys and associated facility assessments [Internet]. Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, USA agency for international development. 2018. [cited 2019 Jul 1]. Available from: https://datadent.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nutrition-Data-Convening-Meeting-Report-Full.pdf
- Kupka R, Siekmans K, Beal T. The diets of children: overview of available data for children and adolescents. Global Food Secur. 2020 Dec 1;27:100442.
- Tangcharoensathien V, Srisookwatana O, Pinprateep P, et al. Multisectoral actions for health: challenges and opportunities in complex policy environments. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 16;6:359–363.
- Marasini MK, Mugenyi S. Overcoming the limits of evidence on effective multisectoral nutrition policy. Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Dec 1;37:S183–4.
- Armstrong R, Doyle J, Lamb C, et al. Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28:168–172.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112448/MPU-L1SN.png"})