917
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for r-convex positive stochastic processes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 87-90 | Received 03 Apr 2018, Accepted 10 Oct 2018, Published online: 01 Nov 2018

ABSTRACT

In the present work, we aim to find Hermite–Hadamard type inequality for r-convex positive stochastic processes. The case of the product of an r-convex and s-convex stochastic process is also investigated.

2010 AMS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATIONS:

1. Introduction

Convex stochastic processes are introduced by Nikodem [Citation1] in 1980. Skowroński [Citation2] generalized certain well-known properties of convex functions to convex stochastic processes. In [Citation3], Kotrys investigated the Hermite–Hadamard inequality involving convex stochastic processes. In recent works on convex stochastic processes, many authors studied different integral inequalities, see [Citation3–9].

Motivated from the above works, we study the Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for r-convex stochastic processes. We also consider the case of a product of an r-convex and s-convex stochastic process.

2. Preliminaries

Let (Ω,F,P) be an arbitrary probability space. A F-measurable function X:ΩR is said to be a random variable. Let IR be an interval. Then a function X:I×ΩR is said to be the stochastic process if the function X(t,.) is a random variable for all t in I.

Let Plim and E[X] denote the limit in probability and the expected value of X, respectively. A stochastic process X:I×ΩR is said to be continuous in probability if Plimtt0 X(t,.)=X(t0,.) for all t0I while it is said to mean-square continuous in I if limtt0E[(X(t)X(t0))2]=0,t0I.

It is worthy to note that if X:I×ΩR is mean-square continuous, then it is continuous in I but the converse does not hold.

The mean-square integral is defined as: A random variable Y : ΩR is said to be the mean-square integral of the stochastic process X:I×ΩR on [a,b]I with E[(X(t))2]<tI, if for every normal sequence of partitions of [a,b], the following relation holds limnE[(k=1nX(Θk)(tktk1)Y)2]=0, where Θk[tk1,tk], k=1,2,3,,n and a=t0<t1<t2<<tn=b is the partition of [a,b]. Thus, we can write Y(.)=abX(t,.)dt(a.e). The assumption of the mean-square continuity of the stochastic process is enough for the mean-square integral to exist.

From the definition of mean-square integral, we immediately have the following relation. X(t,.)Y(t,.)(a.e),for t[a,b]==>abX(t,.)dtabY(t,.)dt(a.e.).

That is a mean-square integral is monotonic. Throughout the entire paper, the monotonicity of mean-square integral and positivity of the stochastic process will be frequently used. Now, we define the following.

Definition 2.1

A stochastic process X:I×Ω[0,) is said to be r-convex, if for each u,vI and λ[0,1] (1) X(λu+(1λ)v,.){(λXr(u,.)+(1λ)Xr(v,.))1/r,r0(X(u,.))λ(X(v,.))1λ,r=0(a.e.).(1) Note that 0-convex stochastic processes are logarithmic convex (see [Citation9]) and 1-convex stochastic processes are the classical convex stochastic process. Note that if X is r-convex, then Xr is convex stochastic process (r>0).

The above definition is analogue of the r-convex functions in the classical convex functions, see [Citation10, Citation11].

Kotrys [Citation3] studied the following well-known Hermite–Hadamard type inequality X(u+v2)1vuuvX(t,.)dxX(u,.)+X(v,.)2(a.e), where X:I×ΩR is Jensen convex and mean-square continuous stochastic process.

Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for log-convex functions was investigated by Dragomir and Mond [Citation12].

Pachpatte [Citation13, Citation14] also gave some other refinements of these inequalities related with differentiable log-convex functions.

Tomar et al. [Citation9] proved the following inequalities:

Let X:I×Ω(0,) be a log-convex stochastic process. Then for u,vI with u<v, the following inequalities hold: X(u+v2,.)1vuuvX(t,.)dtX(u,.)X(v,.)logX(u,.)logX(v,.)=L(X(u,.),X(v,.))(a.e), where L(p,q) (pq) is the logarithmic mean of real numbers p,q>0.

We also need the Jensen inequality for convex stochastic process proved by Sarikaya et al. [Citation7].

For a convex stochastic process X:I×ΩR, we have X(1vuuvϕ(t,.)dt,.)1vuuvXϕ(t,.)dt(a.e.), where ϕ:I×ΩIR is an arbitrary non-negative integrable stochastic process. For a brief history and studies, we refer to [Citation8, Citation15–20].

3. Main results

Theorem 3.1

Let X:I×Ω[0,) be a r-convex stochastic process with mean-square continuity in I.  Then for u,vI with u<v, the below inequality holds (2) 1vuuvX(t,.)dt[Xr(u,.)+Xr(v,.)2]1/r,r1,(a.e.).(2)

Proof.

From Jensen inequality, we obtain (1vuuvX(t,.)dt)r1vuuvXr(t,.)dt(a.e.). Since Xr is convex, then Hemite-Hadamard type inequality for convex stochastic processes yields us (see [Citation3]) 1vuuvXr(t,.)dt.Xr(u,.)+Xr(v,.)2(a.e.). Hence, 1vuuvX(t,.)dt[Xr(u,.)+Xr(v,.)2]1/r(a.e.). This completes the proof.

Corollary 3.1

Let X:I×Ω[0,) be 1-convex stochastic process with mean-square continuity in I. Then for u,vI with u<v, the following inequality holds. Then 1vuuvX(t,.)dtX(u,.)+X(v,.)2.

Theorem 3.2

Let X:I×Ω(0,) be r-convex stochastic process (r0) with mean-square continuity in I. Then for u,vI  with u<v, X(u,.)X(v,.) the following inequalities hold (3) 1vuuvX(t,.)dt{rr+1[Xr+1(v,.)Xr+1(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)], r0X(v,.)X(u,.)logX(v,.)logX(u,.),r=0(a.e.).(3)

Proof.

For r=0, Tomar et al. [Citation9] proved this result. We proceed for the case r>0. Since X is r-convex stochastic process, for all λ[0,1], we have X(λu+(1λ)v,.)(λXr(u,.)+(1λ)Xr(v,.))1/r(a.e.). Therefore by using the same method as of [Citation3], we have 1vuuvX(t,.)dt01(Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)))1/rdλ(a.e.). Putting τ=Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)), we have 1vuuvX(t,.)dt1Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)(τ)1/rdτ=rr+1[Xr+1(v,.)Xr+1(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)],(a.e.) which completes the proof.

Note that for r=1, in the above theorem, we have the same inequality again as in Corollary 3.1.

Theorem 3.3

Let X:I×Ω(0,) be r-convex (0rs) stochastic process with mean-square continuity in I. Then X is s-convex stochastic process.

Proof.

To prove this, we need the following inequality for non-negative real numbers x, y (4) x1λyλ((1λ)xr+λyr)1/r((1λ)xs+λys)1/s,(see [11])(4) where 0λ1, 0rs. Since X is r-convex stochastic process, by inequality (4) for all u,vI, λ[0,1], we obtain X(λu+(1λ)v,.){(λXr(u,.)+(1λ)Xr(v,.))1/r(λXs(u,.)+(1λ)Xs(v,.))1/s,0<rs(X(u,.))λ(X(v,.))1λ(λXs(u,.)+(1λ)Xs(v,.))1/s,0=rs.(a.e.). Hence, X is a s-convex stochastic process.

As a special case of the above theorem, we deduce the following results.

Corollary 3.2

Let X:I×Ω(0,) be r-convex (0r1) stochastic process with mean-square continuity in the interval I. Then X  is a convex stochastic process.

Corollary 3.3

Let X:I×Ω(0,) be r-convex (0rs) stochastic process with mean-square continuity in the interval I. Then the following inequalities holds: 1vuuvX(t,.)dt{rr+1[Xr+1(v,.)Xr+1(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)]ss+1[Xs+1(v,.)Xs+1(u,.)Xs(v,.)Xs(u,.)],0<rsX(v,.)X(u,.)logX(v,.)logX(u,.)ss+1[Xs+1(v,.)Xs+1(u,.)Xs(v,.)Xs(u,.)],0=rs.(a.e.).

Proof.

The proof follows at once by using Theorem 3.3 and proceeding on similar lines as Theorem 3.1.

Theorem 3.4

Let X,Y:I×Ω(0,) be r-convex and s-convex stochastic process with mean-square continuity respectively. Then for u,vI  with u<v, the following inequalities hold: 1vuuvX(t,.)Y(t,.)dt12rr+2[Xr+2(v,.)Xr+2(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)]+12ss+2[Ys+2(v,.)Ys+2(u,.)Ys(v,.)Ys(u,.)](X(u,.)X(v,.), Y(u,.)Y(v,.)),(a.e.).

Proof.

Since X is r-convex stochastic process and Y is s-convex stochastic convex, for all λ[0,1], we have X(λu+(1λ)v,.)(λXr(u,.)+(1λ)Xr(v,.))1/r(a.e.),Y(λu+(1λ)v,.))(λYs(u,.)+(1λ)Ys(v,.))1/s(a.e.). Therefore, 1vuuvX(t,.)Y(t,.)dt=01X(λu+(1λ)v,.)Y(λu+(1λ)v,.))dλ01(λXr(u,.)+(1λ)Xr(v,.))1/r(λYs(u,.)+(1λ)Ys(v,.))1/sdλ=01(Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)))1/r×(Yu(v,.)+λ(Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.)))1/sdλ(a.e.). Now applying Cauchy's inequality, we obtain 01(Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)))1/r×(Ys(v,.)+λ(Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.)))1/sdλ1201[Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.))]2/rdλ+1201[Ys(v,.)+λ(Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.))]2/sdλ(a.e.). If we choose τ=Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)), η=Ys(v,.)+λ(Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.)), then we obtain the following inequality 01(Xr(v,.)+λ(Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)))1/r×(Ys(v,.)+λ(Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.)))1/sdλ121Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)Xr(u,.)Xr(v,.)(τ)2/rdτ+121Ys(v,.)Ys(u,.)Ys(u,.)Ys(v,.)(η)2/sdη=12rr+2[Xr+2(v,.)Xr+2(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)]+12ss+2[Ys+2(v,.)Ys+2(u,.)Ys(v,.)Ys(u,.)],(a.e.), which leads us to the required result.

Note: By putting X=Y, r=s=2, in the above theorem, we have the following inequality 1vuuvX2(t,.)dtX2(u,.)+X2(v,.)2(a.e.). The following result can be easily proved by proceeding on similar lines as in the above theorem.

Theorem 3.5

Let X:I×Ω[0,) be r-convex and Y:I×Ω(0,) be positive 0-convex stochastic processes with mean-square continuity in I respectively. Then for u,vI  with u<v, the following inequalities hold: 1vuuvX(t,.)Y(t,.)dt12rr+2[Xr+2(v,.)Xr+2(u,.)Xr(v,.)Xr(u,.)]+14[Y2(v,.)Y2(u,.)logY(v,.)logY(u,.)](X(u,.)X(v,.)(a.e.).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the referees of this article for their insightful comments which greatly improves the entire presentation of the paper. W. Ul-Haq and Z. Al-Hussain thank Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) for providing excellent research facilities.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Nikodem K. On convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 1980;20:184–197. doi: 10.1007/BF02190513
  • Skowroński A. On some properties of J-convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 1992;44:249–258. doi: 10.1007/BF01830983
  • Kotrys D. Hermite–Hadamard inequality for convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 2012;83:143–151. doi: 10.1007/s00010-011-0090-1
  • Kotrys D. Remarks on strongly convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 2013;86:91–98. doi: 10.1007/s00010-012-0163-9
  • Agahi H, Babakhani A. On fractional stochastic inequalities related to Hermite–Hadamard and Jensen types for convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 2016;90:1035–1043. doi: 10.1007/s00010-016-0425-z
  • Li L, Hao Z. On Hermite–Hadamard inequality for h−convex stochastic processes. Aequat Math. 2017;91:909–920. doi: 10.1007/s00010-017-0488-5
  • Sarikaya MZ, Yaldiz H, Budak H. Some integral inequalities for convex stochastic processes. Acta Math Univ Comenianae. 2016;LXXXV:155–164.
  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG. Stochastic convexity and its applications. Adv Appl Prob. 1988;20:427–446. doi: 10.2307/1427398
  • Tomar M, Set E, Maden S. Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for log convex stochastic processes. J New Theory. 2015;2:23–32.
  • Bessenyei M. Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for generalized 3-convex functions. Publ Math Debrecen. 2004;65(1-2):223–232.
  • Zabandan G, Bodaghi A, Kilicman A. The hermite–Hadamard inequality for r-convex functions. J Inequal Appl. 2012;2012:215. doi: 10.1186/1029-242X-2012-215.
  • Dragomir SS, Mond B. Integral inequalities of Hadamard type for log-convex functions. Demonst Math. 1988;31:354–364.
  • Pachpatte BG. A note on integral inequalities involving two log-convex functions. Math Inequal Appl. 2004;7:511–515.
  • Pachpatte BG. Mathematical inequalities. Amsterdam: North-Holland Library Elsevier Science; 2005.
  • Kuczma M. An introduction to the theory of functional equations and inequalities, cauchy's equation and jensen's inequality. Warszawa-Kraków-Katowice: PWN-Uniwersytet Ślaski; 1985.
  • Ngoc NPN, Vinh NV, Hien PTT. Integral Inequalities of Hadamard type for r-convex functions. Int Math Forum. 2009;4(35):1723–1728.
  • Niculescu CP, Persson LE. Convex functions and their applications. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
  • Pearce CEM, Pečarić JE, Šimić V. Stolarsky means and Hadamard's inequality. J Math Anal Appl. 1998;220:99–109. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5822
  • Pečarić JE, Proschan F, Tong YL. Convex functions, partial orderings and statistical applications. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1992.
  • Sobczyk K. Stochastic differential equations with applications to physics and engineering. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1991.