1,650
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

On the quaternion projective space

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1538-1543 | Received 07 Jul 2020, Accepted 27 Sep 2020, Published online: 18 Nov 2020

Abstract

Apart from being a vital and exciting field in mathematics with interesting results, projective spaces have various applications in design theory, coding theory, physics, combinatorics, number theory and extremal combinatorial problems. In this paper, we consider real, complex and quaternion projective spaces. We focus on the geometric feature of the sectional curvatures. We first study the real and complex projective spaces. We prove that their sectional curvatures are constant. Then, we consider the quaternion projective space. Specifically, we prove that the quaternion projective space has a positive constant sectional curvature. We also determine the pinching constant for the complex and quaternion projective spaces.

AMS subject classifications:

1. Introduction

The projective geometry plays a vital role in many visual computing domains, in particular, computer vision modelling and computer graphics [Citation1]. It gives a mathematical formalism to prescribe the geometry of cameras and the associated transformations, therefore enabling the design of computational approaches that manipulate 2-dimensional (2-D) projections of 3-D objects. In this regard, a fundamental side is the fact that objects at infinity can be represented and handled with projective geometry and this in contrast to the Euclidean geometry. Indeed the projective geometry turns out to be very useful in order to prescribe some complex phenomena in physics [Citation2].

The quaternions Q be 4-D real algebra generated by the identity element 1 and the symbols i, j and k. So Q={q0+q1i+q2j+q3k:q0,q1,q2,q3R}, where (1) ij=ji=k,jk=kj=i,ki=ik=j,i2=j2=k2=1.(1) We call Req=q0 the real part of the quaternion number q and Imq=qq0 the imaginary part. The space of imaginary qQ is denoted ImQ. The conjugate of q is q¯=ReqImq=q0q1iq2jq3k. The norm of q, |q|=qq¯=q¯q=q02+q12+q22+q32. Recall that Q is not commutative, so that we should be careful with the order of factors in products. Indeed Q is a real division algebra i.e. |pq|=|p||q| for all p,qQ. Qn is the nD right module over the quaternions Q. If a=(a1,,an) and b=(b1,,bn) are two vectors in Qn, where ai,biQ, then we denote by aq the vector (a1q,a2q,,anq), qQ.

The set of all matrices of degree n with coefficients in Q will be denoted by M(n,Q). A matrix σM(n,Q) is said to be symplectic if and only if σ¯tσ=I, where I is the identity n×n matrix, that is σ1=σ¯t, σ1 being the inverse of σ defined by σ1σ=I. The group of all symplectic matrices will be denoted by Sp(n), we denote the Lie algebra of Sp(n), the set of matrices σM(n,Q) which satisfies σ¯+σt=0, by sp(n).

Quaternion Algebra is a bit of a mixed bag, this is a very interesting and powerful tool for both modelling certain phenomenon, and for algebraic study. Moreover it turns out to be very important in areas of mesh deformation, biomechanics, physics, computer graphics and molecular modelling. For more details about the quaternion algebra, we refer to [Citation3].

Riemannian submersions, presented by O'Neill [Citation4] and Gray [Citation5], have been utilized by various authors to establish some definite Riemannian metrics, such as Einstein, positively curved [Citation6,Citation7]. Indeed Riemannian submersions are used to investigate different geometric structures of Riemannian manifolds [Citation8,Citation9]. Sectional curvature is of great importance in differential geometry. This concept describes how curved the space is in some 2-D subspace of the tangent space at a given point. We are interested in those homogeneous spaces that have strictly positive sectional curvatures. An important feature of these spaces is the so called “pinching constant” i.e. the quotient of the maximal and minimal positive sectional curvatures.

This article is concerned with a study of some geometric properties of the projective spaces as a Riemannian homogenous symmetric spaces. The geometric feature that we focus on are the sectional curvatures. Namely, we determine the sectional curvature for the real projective spaces, using the properties of it as a homogenous Riemannian symmetric space. We also determine the sectional curvature for the complex and quaternion projective spaces, using the Riemannian submersions and O'Neill formula. An important feature of these spaces is called pinching constant, which is the quotient of the maximal and minimal positive sectional curvatures. The projective spaces can be studied as a separate field, but are also used in different applied areas, geometry especially. The projective spaces play an important role in various aspects combinatorics, design theory, number theory, physics, coding theory and extremal combinatorial problems. Indeed projective spaces are important for topology and algebraic topology as well. There are differential projective spaces that finite projective spaces that have applications in analysis and discrete mathematics. Many authors mainly had paid attention to study the projective spaces and their applications, see [Citation10–15].

2. Preliminaries

We represent the set of all tangent vectors at p by Tp(M), the so called tangent space, where M is smooth manifold, χ(M) is the set of all smooth vector fields and C(M) is the set of smooth functions of M.

Definition 2.1

[Citation16]

A connection ∇ on a smooth manifold M is a map :χ(M)×χ(M)χ(M), (E,F)EF, which satisfies the following properties:

  1. E(F+Υ)=EF+EΥ,

  2. E+FΥ=EΥ+FΥ,

  3. hEF=hEF,

  4. EhF=E(h)F+hEF, E,F,Υχ(M) and hC(M).

Definition 2.2

[Citation17]

A Riemannian metric g on a smooth manifold M is a tensor of type (0,2) that obey

  1. g(E,F)=g(F,E),

  2. g(αE+γF,Υ)=αg(E,F)+γg(F,Υ),

  3. If g(E,F)=0, Eχ(M),then F=0,

  4. g(E,E)>0, E0,E,F,Υχ(M) and α,γC(M).

(M,g) is called a Riemannian manifold.

Definition 2.3

[Citation17]

A pseudo-Riemannian manifold is a pair (M,g), M is a real differentiable manifold and g is a field of non-degenerate symmetric bilinear forms on M.

Proposition 2.1

[Citation16]

Consider a Riemannian manifold M, there is a unique connection ∇ on M satisfies

(1)

EFFE=[E,F].

(2)

Eg(F,Υ)=g(EF,Υ)+g(F,EΥ), E,F,Υχ(M).

Here ∇ is called Riemannian connection or Levi–Civita connection.

Definition 2.4

[Citation8]

Consider (M,g) and ∇ are the Riemannian manifold and Riemannian connection, respectively. The curvature tensor of type (1,3) defined by R(E,F)Υ=EFΥFE[E,F]Υ.

Definition 2.5

[Citation17]

Given a point pM and let lTp(M) be a 2-D subspace of Tp(M) and let E,Fl be two linearly independent vectors. Then (2) K(E,F)=g(R(E,F)F,E)g(E,E)g(F,F)g(E,F)2(2) does not depend on the choice of the vectors E,Fl and K(E,F) is called the sectional curvature of l at p, where R is the curvature tensor at p. If all sectional curvature at all points of M is equal to constant C, then M is said to be a space of constant curvature.

Remark 2.1

If E and F are orthonormal vectors, then the sectional curvature of a Riemannian manifold is denoted by K(E,F)=g(R(E,F)F,E).

Definition 2.6

[Citation18]

Let V be a finite-dimensional vector space over an arbitrary field K. The projective space P(V) is the set of 1−D linear subspaces of V, where dimP(V)=dimV1 (dimension of P(V)), which denoted by PKn or KPn.

Definition 2.7

The standard unit n-sphere Sn is the set of points (x0,x1,,xn) in Rn+1, which obey the equation x02+x12++xn2=1.

3. Riemannian submersions

In this section, we need some important input from [Citation4,Citation5] and [Citation6, Chapter 9] about the Riemanniana submersions and the most important related notions for our purpose.

Definition 3.1

[Citation4]

Let π:MB be a differentiable map between differential manifolds M and B. Then π is a submersion if its differential dπp is surjective for all points pM.

Definition 3.2

[Citation4]

Let π:(M,g)(B,f) be a smooth submersion. Then the vertical bundle V=Ker(dπ) is the kernel of the differential dπ. The horizontal bundle is the orthogonal complement to V, i.e. H=(V).

At each point pM, we have TpM=VpHp. A vector field on a manifold M is said to be vertical (or horizontal) if it is tangent (or orthogonal) to fibres π1(b), for all bB. We also denote the projections of vector fields in C(TM) to the vertical and horizontal bundles by V and H, respectively. The horizontal and vertical parts of vector field X on M are represented by XH and XV, respectively.

Definition 3.3

[Citation4]

Consider (M,g) and (B,f) are Riemannian manifolds, p be a point in M. A Riemannian submersion π:MB is a mapping with a differential dπ that satisfies

  1. dπ:TpMTπ(p)B is surjective for all pM,

  2. dπ preserves lengths of horizontal vectors, i.e. g(X,Y)=f(dπ(X),dπ(Y)),for all horizontal X and Y.

O'Neill in [Citation4] defines a fundamental tensor describes submersion as follows: For arbitrary vector fields E,FC(TM) on M, the tensors A is defined as (3) AEF=VHE(HF)+HHE(VF).(3)

Lemma 3.1

[Citation4]

If X and Y are horizontal vector fields, then AXY=AYX=12V[X,Y].

Definition 3.4

[Citation19]

Let (M,g) and (B,f) be two pseudo-Riemannian manifolds. A smooth surjective submersion π:M,B is a pseudo-Riemannian submersion (see [Citation20]) when dπ preserves scalar products of vectors normal to fibres and when the metric induced on every fibre π1(b), where bB, is non-degenerate.

Proposition 3.1

[Citation4]

If X, Y, Z, H be horizontal vector fields on M. Then the curvatures R of M and R of B satisfy (4) R(X,Y)Z,H=R(X,Y)Z,H+2AXY,AZHAYZ,AXHAZX,AYH.(4)

Corollary 3.1

[Citation4]

Let π:MB be a submersion, and let K and K be the sectional curvature of M and B, respectively. If X and Y are horizontal vectors at a point of M, then (5) K(X,Y)=K(X,Y)+3|AXY|2.(5)

4. Real and complex projective spaces

We discuss some important as well as interesting properties for real and complex projective spaces. First, we give some definitions and propositions, which turn out to be very important in order to study these projective spaces in a completely unified way. Second, we prove that these projective spaces are spaces of constant curvature.

It is well known that the Grassmann manifolds Gp,q(Ψ) of all p-planes in Ψp+q, where Ψ is the set of real numbers, complex numbers or quaternions. As a special case G1,q(Ψ) or Gp,1(Ψ) is a projective space. For more details about Grassmannians manifold, we refer to [Citation16,Citation21].

4.1. Real projective space RPn

Here we determine the sectional curvature for the real projective spaces, using the properties of it as a homogenous Riemannian symmetric space.

Definition 4.1

RPn is the set of all 1-D subspaces through the origin in Rn+1.

We define an equivalence relation ∼ on Rn+1{0} as, aba=μb for some μR{0}. The quotient space (set of all equivalence classes) is precisely RPn.

Since each line through the origin in Rn+1 intersects the sphere Sn, we can keep under control this relation to Sn: a,bSn;aba=μbfor some μR with |μ|=1. Let π:SnRPn be the quotient map, which assigns to aSn the line in Rn through a, and let π(a)=[a]. The inverse image π1([a]) of any point [a]RPn is the two point set {a,a}, which is isomorphic to the 0-sphere S0.

Proposition 4.1

[Citation22]

RPnSn/{±1}.

Remark 4.1

Every point in RPn is depicted by two points in Sn.

Definition 4.2

Let G be a Lie group and K be a closed subgroup with Lie algebras g_ and h_. A homogeneous space G/K is called reductive if there exists a complementary subspace m_ of h_ in g_ that is Ad(K)-invariant i.e. g=h_m_ with Ad(H)(m_)m_.

Proposition 4.2

The real projective space has constant sectional curvature with value 1.

Proof.

Consider the real projective space denoted by G1,q(R) or Gp,1(R). let X,Nm_=W=0AAt0;A is p×q real matrix be the orthonormal vectors. Hence the sectional curvature of the plane spanned by X, N, is specified by Equation (Equation2). If q = 1, N=a1...aNandX=x1...xN are orthonormal vectors i.e. g(N,N)=g(X,X)=1andg(X,N)=0,then K(X,N)=g(R(N,X)N,X). Now we want to prove that K(X,N) is constant. Consider the inner product (6) g(A,B)=RetrABt.(6) The curvature tensor R is given by (7) R(X,Y)Z=XYtZ+ZYtXYXtZZXtY,(7) where X, Y, Z are real p×q matrices.

From Equations (Equation6) and (Equation7) we get R(N,X)N=2T(N,X,N)T(X,N,N)T(N,N,X)=2NXtNXNtNNNtX, where T(X,Y,Z)=XYtZ and as g(X,N)=0, g(N,N)=1, we obtain NXtN=a1...apx1...xpa1...ap=a1...ap(x1a1++xpap)=0,XNtN=x1...xpa1...apa1...ap=x1...xp=X,NNtX=a1...apa1...apx1...xp=0, then R(N,X)N=0X0=X. It follows that K(X,N)=g(R(N,X)N,X)=X,X=1. Hence Gp,1(R) is a space of constant curvature, similarly for G1,q(R).

4.2. Complex projective space CPn

In this section, we determine the sectional curvature for the complex projective space, using the Riemannian submersions and O'Neill formula.

Definition 4.3

CPn is the set of 1-D complex–linear subspaces of Cn+1.

We define an equivalence relation ∼ on Cn+1{0} as aba=μb. The quotient space is exactly CPn.

Since each line through the origin in Cn+1R2n+2 intersects the sphere S2n+1. We can keep under control this relation to S2n+1: a,bS2n+1;aba=μbfor some μC with |μ|=1. Let π:S2n+1CPn be the quotient map, which assigns to aS2n+1 the complex line in Cn+1 through a, and let π(a)=[a]. The inverse image π1([a]) of any point [a]CPn is the set {eiθa;θ[0,2π]}, which is isomorphic to the 1-sphere S1.

Proposition 4.3

[Citation22]

CPnS2n+1/S1.

Remark 4.2

Each point in CPn is represented by a circle in S2n+1.

Proposition 4.4

The complex projective space has sectional curvature lies in interval [1,4].

Proof.

Let us consider the Hopf bundle π:S2n+1CPn and N be the unit normal on the unit sphere S2n+1R2n+2, then IN is defined the vertical vector field on S2n+1. Then AXY=X,IYIN,AX(IN)=IX, where X and Y are horizontal vectors on S2n+1 and I is complex structure. Since IN is a unit field spanning the vertical distribution, hence (8) |AXY|2=AXY,IN2=Y,AX(IN)2=Y,IX2=X,IY2.(8) For the orthonormal vector fields X and Y, it follows from Equations (Equation5) and (Equation8) that K(X,Y)=1+3|AXY|2=1+3X,IY2. Thus, the sectional curvature of the complex projective space CPn lies between 1 and 4.

Remark 4.3

The projective spaces RPn and CPn are compact, Hausdorff, second countable and smooth manifolds of dimensions n & 2n.

In the next section, we study widely from one of the most important type of projective spaces, namely the quaternion projective space.

5. Quaternion projective space

We prove that the quaternion projective space is a space of constant curvature, using the Riemannian submersions and O'Neill formula.

Definition 5.1

The quaternion projective space QPn is the set of all 1-D subspaces through the origin in Qn+1. It is a compact, smooth 4n-D manifold

Consider the quaternion projective space QPn as the set of all (unordered) directions in Qn+1. A quaternion line is isomorphic to R4, but not all real 4-D subspaces of Qn+1 are complex lines. We define an equivalence relation ∼ on Qn+1{0} by aba=μbfor some μ0 in Q. The quotient space is exactly QPn.

Since each line through 0 in Qn+1R4n+4 intersects the sphere S4n+3, we can keep under control this relation to S4n+3: a,bS4n+3;aba=μbfor some μQwith |μ|=1. Let π:S4n+3QPn be the quotient map (Hopf map), which assigns to aS4n+3 the quaternionic line in Qn+1 through x, and let π(a)=[a]. The inverse image π1([a]) of any point [a]QPn is the set {qa;qQ,|q|1}, which is isomorphic to the 1-sphere S3.

Remark 5.1

Each point in QPn is represented by a 3-sphere in S4n+3.

Definition 5.2

[Citation23]

Let M be the quaternion projective space, xM. For each two unit vectors X, Y in Tx(M), define the “angle” function φ(X,Y), 0<φ(X,Y)<π2 as follows (9) cos2φ(X,Y)=XI,Y2+XJ,Y2+XK,Y2.(9)

φ is well defined because it is independent of the choice of a quaternionic structure I,J,K:I2=J2=K2=1 and IJ=K on Tx(M).

Proposition 5.1

The quaternion projective space has sectional curvature lies in interval [1,4].

Proof.

Let us consider the Hopf bundle π:S4n+3QPn and N be the unit normal on the unit sphere S4n+3R2n+2, then IN, JN and KN are defined the vertical vector fields on S4n+3. Hence (10) AXY=IX,YINJX,YJNKX,YKN,(10) where X, Y are horizontal vector of the Hopf bundle and I, J, K are complex structure with IJ = K. According to Equations (Equation5) and (Equation10), we get K(X,Y)=K(X,Y)+3|AXY|2=|X|2|Y|2X,Y2+3XI,Y2+XJ,Y2+XK,Y2. For the orthonormal vector fields X and Y, it follows from Equation (Equation9), that (11) K(X,Y)=1+3cos2φ(X,Y).(11) Thus, the sectional curvature K of the quaternion projective space QPn satisfies 1K4.

Definition 5.3

Consider a compact Riemannian manifold (M,g) with positive sectional curvature K. The pinching constant is defined as follows: δm=minK(σ)maxK(σ), where σ runs through all two-planes of TpM and pM.

This means that the sectional curvature K obeys KmaxKδmKmax>0.

Proposition 5.2

[Citation24]

Let M be a compact, simply connected, Riemannian manifold with its sectional curvature K satisfying KmaxK14Kmax, hence either M is homeomorphic to a sphere or isometric to one of the compact rank one symmetric spaces CPn,QPn.

The pinching constant for the complex projective space CPn and for the quaternion projective space QPn is δCPn=δQPn=14.

6. Conclusions

The projective spaces are considered in this article. Specifically, the real, complex and quaternion projective spaces are introduced. Some interesting observations and notions of these projective spaces are given. Indeed, we proved that their sectional curvatures are constant. The pinching constant for the complex projective space and for the quaternion projective space is determined.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • Hirschfeld JWP, Thas JA. Open problems in finite projective spaces. Finite Fields Appl. 2015;32:44–81.
  • Delphenich D. Projective geometry and special relativity. Ann Phys (Leipzig). 2006;15:216–246.
  • Zhang F. Quaternions and matrices of quaternions. Linear Algebra Appl. 1997;251:21–57.
  • O'Neill B. The fundamental equations of a submersion. Michigan Math J. 1966;13:459–469.
  • Gray A. Pseudo-Riemannian almost product manifolds and submersions. J Math Mech. 1967;16:715–737.
  • Besse AL. Einstein manifolds. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987.
  • Gromoll D, Walschap G. Metric foliations and curvature. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2009. (Progress in mathematics; 268).
  • Petersen P. Riemannian geometry. New York (NY): Springer; 1998.
  • Girbau J, Bruna L. Stability by linearization of Einstein's field equation. New York: Springer; 2010.
  • Korhonen RJ, Tohge K. Second main theorem in the tropical projective space. Adv Math. 2016;298:693–725.
  • Liu Y, Zhuang Z. Characterization of projective spaces by Seshadri constants. Math Z. 2018;289:25–38.
  • Shahid MH, Al-Solamy FR. Ricci tensor of slant submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. C R Math Acad Sci Paris. 2011;349(9):571–573.
  • Bosch-Sijtsema PM, Tjell J. The concept of project space: studying construction project teams from a spatial perspective. Int J Proj Manag. 2017;35(7):1312–1321.
  • Boote Y, Ray N. On the symmetric squares of complex and quaternionic projective space. Glasgow Math J. 2018;60(3):703–729.
  • Fei J, Peng C, Xu X. Minimal two-spheres with constant curvature in the quaternionic projective space. Sci China Math. 2019. doi:10.1007/s11425-018-9348-y.
  • Helgason S. Differential geometry, Lie groups and symmetric spaces. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1978.
  • Spivak. An introduction to Lie groups and the geometry of homogeneous spaces. AMS; 1999.
  • Joswig M, Theobald T. Polyhedral and algebraic methods in computational geometry. London: Springer; 2013.
  • Baditoiu G. Classification of pseudo-Riemannian submersions with totally geodesic fibres from pseudo-hyperbolic spaces. Proc London Math Soc. 2012;105:1315–1338.
  • O'Neill B. Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1983.
  • Omar Y. A study of geometrical properties of Grassmannian manifolds and applications [Master thesis]. Mansoura University; 2014.
  • Gallier J. Notes on group actions, manifolds, Lie groups and Lie algebras. 2005. Available from: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/cis610/lie1.pdf.
  • Krainse VY. Topology of quaternionic manifolds. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1966;122:357–367.
  • Berger M. Les variétés Riemanniennes (1/4)-pincèes. Ann Scuola Norm Sup Pisa (3). 1960;14:161–170.