ABSTRACT
Reactive nitrogen (Nr) emission from soils, e.g., nitrous acid (HONO) and nitric oxide (NO), is a key process of the global nitrogen (N) cycle and has significant implications for atmospheric chemistry. To understand the underlying mechanisms of soil Nr emissions, air-dried or oven-dried soils are commonly used in the laboratory. To date, few studies have compared the effects of different drying methods on soil Nr gas fluxes and N fractions. Here, the authors studied soil water content, pH, (in)organic N content, and Nr gas fluxes of air-dried, freeze-dried, oven-dried, and fresh soils from different land-use types. The results showed that the soil pH of air-dried and oven-dried samples was significantly lower compared with fresh soil from farmland and grassland, but higher compared with forest soil. The difference in soil pH between freeze-dried and fresh soil (mean ± standard deviation: 0.52 ± 0.31) was the lowest. In general, all drying methods increased the soil NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and dissolved organic N contents compared with fresh soil (P < 0.05). The maximum HONO and NO flux and total emissions during a full wetting–drying cycle of fresh soil were also increased by air-drying and oven-drying (P < 0.001), but comparable with freeze-dried soil (P > 0.2). In conclusion, all drying methods should be considered for use in studies on the land–atmosphere interface and biogeochemical N cycling, whereas the freeze-drying method might be better for studies involving the measurement of soil Nr gas fluxes.
Graphical Abstract
![](/cms/asset/8965fcab-3cad-4e99-a780-e524aa46596a/taos_a_1733388_uf0001_c.jpg)
摘要
土壤活性氮气体 (HONO和NO) 排放是全球氮循环的关键过程, 对大气化学具有重要意义。本研究采集了农田, 草地和森林三种不同土地利用类型的土壤样品, 分别对样品进行了风干, 冻干和烘干三种处理, 并与未处理的新鲜土壤进行比较研究。结果表明, 三种类型土壤的冻干土与新鲜土样品的pH值差异最小。总的来说, 三种干燥处理都能提高新鲜土壤NH4+-N, NO3−-N和溶解态有机N的含量。与新鲜土壤相比, 冻干土壤HONO和NO的最大排放通量及完整干湿交替循环的总排放量没有显著增加, 而风干和烘干土壤显著增加。因此, 冷冻干燥方法可能更适合涉及土壤活性氮气体排放通量的研究。这一发现的重要启示是, 我们需要慎重评价以往基于不同干燥方法得到的有关陆地–大气界面活性氮交换过程和生物地球化学氮循环机制的认识。
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Supplementary Material
The supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.