2,580
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Ammonia should be considered in field experiments mimicking nitrogen deposition

氮沉降模拟实验亟待研究大气氨浓度增加的影响

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 248-251 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 22 Jan 2020, Published online: 05 Mar 2020

ABSTRACT

Excess nitrogen deposition has significant impacts on water eutrophication, soil acidification, eleveted greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity loss. These impacts mostly derive from conventional manipulative experiments in the field by adding nitrogen solution directly onto grassland or forest floors. For forest ecosystems, previous field experiments have usually ignored the nitrogen cycles in the canopy, which are important in responses to airborne nitrogen input. Although whole-forest canopy nitrogen fertilization has recently been conducted to promote our understanding of nitrogen deposition processes, spraying nitrogen solution onto plants still largely ignores the dry deposition of ammonia (as well as other gaseous reactive nitrogen species). To date, there have been a limited number of field studies that have investigated the bi-directional exchange of ammonia between the atmosphere and plants, not to mention the impacts of ammonia on natural ecosystems. Due to the increasing trend of atmospheric ammonia concentrations worldwide and its dominant role in nitrogen deposition and haze pollution, the next generation of experiments should mimick nitrogen deposition on natural ecosystems by further considering the dry deposition of ammonia.

Graphical abstract

摘要

大气活性氮污染及其过量沉降是全球变化重要议题。为研究氮沉降对自然生态系统结构和功能的影响, 基于喷淋加氮的控制实验在草地或林下广泛开展。该实验体系假定氮沉降是通过增加土壤氮的有效性从而影响整个生态系统, 没有考虑植被与大气活性氮的相互作用, 也未能反映氮沉降以干沉降为主的自然过程。考虑到大气氨是氮沉降的主要前体物, 且全球氨气浓度呈现上升趋势, 未来的氮沉降模拟实验亟待研究氨气干沉降的重要影响, 以期更加完整的刻画大气氮沉降过程及其生态环境效应。

Since the early 20th century, the global nitrogen (N) cycle has been significantly altered by increasing fertilizer production and fossil fuel combustion (Pan et al. Citation2016; Vitousek Citation1997). Globally, reactive N production increased from 15 Tg N yr−1 in 1860 to 187 Tg N yr−1 in 2005 (Gruber and Galloway Citation2008). More than half of this human-produced N was ultimately returned to the ground via wet and dry deposition. Following Europe (Dise and Wright Citation1995) and North America (Fenn et al. Citation1998), East Asia has become a new hotspot of atmospheric N deposition over recent decades (Pan et al. Citation2012; Xu et al. Citation2015). When the additional N deposition exceeds the N demand of natural ecosystems, cascading environmental problems may occur, including water eutrophication, soil acidification, eleveted greenhouse gas emissions, and biodiversity loss (Fowler et al. Citation2013; Galloway et al. Citation2003; Huang et al. Citation2015).

To quantify the impacts of atmospheric N deposition on natural ecosystems, manipulative field experiments mimicking N deposition have been extensively conducted, e.g., by adding N solution directly onto grassland or forest floors (Fang et al. Citation2009; Mo et al. Citation2007; Xia, Niu, and Wan Citation2009) ()). However, these conventional experiments tend to focus on underground processes and ignore the imapcts of N deposition on the canopy, which plays an important role in the N cycle of forest ecosystems (Zhang et al. Citation2015).

Figure 1. Manipulative field experiments mimicking N deposition: (a) conventional understory liquid N addition (mimicking wet deposition); (b) plant canopy liquid N addition (mimicking wet deposition); and (c) future scenarios for plant canopy dry and wet deposition (mimicking N deposition pathways, i.e., wet and dry, and species, i.e., oxidized and reduced forms, especially ammonia).

Figure 1. Manipulative field experiments mimicking N deposition: (a) conventional understory liquid N addition (mimicking wet deposition); (b) plant canopy liquid N addition (mimicking wet deposition); and (c) future scenarios for plant canopy dry and wet deposition (mimicking N deposition pathways, i.e., wet and dry, and species, i.e., oxidized and reduced forms, especially ammonia).

To address these canopy-associated concerns, whole-forest canopy N fertilization experiments have recently been designed ()). For example, aircraft fertilization was performed above the canopy in a mature spruce–hemlock forest in the United States (Gaige et al. Citation2007). Also, pump lifting systems and canopy spraying experiments were conducted in a subtropical temperate deciduous forest in China (Zhang et al. Citation2015). These canopy-based N addition experiments have revealed many important N cycling processes that are different from those revealed by experiments targeting forest floors. Thus, the incomplete knowledge gained from the conventional approach focusing on forest floors cannot be used to extrapolate the impacts of N deposition on forest ecosystems (Zhang et al. Citation2015).

Although this new canopy-based N fertilization technology has improved our knowldege of atmospheric N deposition processes in forest ecosystems, attempts thus far are still insufficient to simulate atmospheric N deposition that occurs naturally. Spraying N solutions onto plants assumes that atmospheric N species are only deposited as rainfall (wet deposition). Such a tradtional technique can be a good proxy for atmospheric wet N deposition owing to its episodic manner in nature. However, dry deposition of gaseous and particulate reactive N is a dependable process involved in the continuous input of airborne N into ecosystems (Wesely Citation1989). To the best of our knowledge, few field experiments (if any) have evaluated the impacts of dry N deposition, not to mention comparisons of dry versus wet N deposition effects (Sheppard et al. Citation2011). Also, the roles of different N species, e.g., oxidized versus reduced forms, have not been fully considered. In particular, gaseous ammonia (NH3) exchange between the atmosphere and leaves has not been well resolved in the field.

In fact, dry deposition contributes half of the total deposited N worldwide, with NH3 being the dominant species (Li et al. Citation2016; Pan et al. Citation2012; Xu et al. Citation2015). Compared with the drecreasing NOx concentrations, atmospheric NH3 concentrations have substantially increased over the past decade (Warner et al. Citation2017), and thus the resulting depositions of reduced N have grown over China and the United States (Liu et al. Citation2016; Pan et al. Citation2018). In addition, a unique long-term field manipulation found that dry deposition of NH3 gas, rather than wet deposition of ammonium ions, played a vital role in shifting peatland plant species composition (Sheppard et al. Citation2011). This finding highlighted the potential for NH3 to destroy natural ecosystems. Clearly, future field and modeling experiments regarding N deposition effects on ecosystems will be incomplete if they do not take dry deposition into account.

To date, there has only been one experiment that manipulated the NH3 dry deposition into an ombrotrophic bog ecosystem (Sheppard et al. Citation2011), but the scenario remains largely unclear in other natural ecosystems (Adriaenssens et al. Citation2012; Cape et al. Citation2009; Pitcairn et al. Citation1998). Therefore, aside from wet deposition, we suggest there is an urgent need for further consideration of the effects of dry deposition (of different N forms) in future manipulative field experiments ()). We propose that the first step should be to conduct a new generation of experiments that mimics N deposition; specifically, Free-Air NH3 Enrichment (FANE) experiments should be conducted, which will allow the investigation of the response of native ecosystems to rising NH3 concentrations in the atmosphere.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Major State Research Development Program of China [grant number 2017YFC0210103] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 41405144, 41425007, and 41807449]. Dianming WU was sponsored by the Shanghai Pujiang Program [grant number 18PJ1403500] and ‘the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities’.

References

  • Adriaenssens, S., J. Staelens, K. Wuyts, S. Van Wittenberghe, T. Wuytack, K. Verheyen, P. Boeckx et al. 2012. “Canopy Uptake of 15NH3 by Four Temperate Tree Species and the Interaction with Leaf Properties.” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 223 (9): 5643–5657. doi:10.1007/s11270-012-1304-4.
  • Cape, J. N., L. J. van der Eerden, L. J. Sheppard, I. D. Leith, and M. A. Sutton. 2009. “Evidence for Changing the Critical Level for Ammonia.” Environmental Pollution 157 (3): 1033–1037. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.049.
  • Dise, N. B., and R. F. Wright. 1995. “Nitrogen Leaching from European Forests in Relation to Nitrogen Deposition.” Forest Ecology and Management 71 (1): 153–161. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)06092-W.
  • Fang, Y., P. Gundersen, J. Mo, and W. Zhu. 2009. “Nitrogen Leaching in Response to Increased Nitrogen Inputs in Subtropical Monsoon Forests in Southern China.” Forest Ecology and Management 257 (1): 332–342. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.004.
  • Fenn, M. E., M. A. Poth, J. D. Aber, J. S. Baron, B. T. Bormann, D. W. Johnson, A. D. Lemly et al. 1998. “Nitrogen Excess in North American Ecosystems: Predisposing Factors, Ecosystem Responses, and Management Strategies.” Ecological Applications 8 (3): 706–733. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0706:NEINAE]2.0.CO;2.
  • Fowler, D., M. Coyle, U. Skiba, M. A. Sutton, J. N. Cape, S. Reis, L. J. Sheppard et al. 2013. “The Global Nitrogen Cycle in the Twenty-first Century.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368 (1621): 20130164. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0164.
  • Gaige, E., D. B. Dail, D. Y. Hollinger, E. A. Davidson, I. J. Fernandez, H. Sievering, A. White et al. 2007. “Changes in Canopy Processes following Whole-Forest Canopy Nitrogen Fertilization of a Mature Spruce-Hemlock Forest.” Ecosystems 10 (7): 1133–1147. doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9081-4.
  • Galloway, J. N., J. D. Aber, J. W. Erisman, S. P. Seitzinger, R. W. Howarth, E. B. Cowling, and B. J. Cosby. 2003. “The Nitrogen Cascade.” Bioscience 53 (4): 341–356. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2.
  • Gruber, N., and J. N. Galloway. 2008. “An Earth-system Perspective of the Global Nitrogen Cycle.” Nature 451: 293. doi:10.1038/nature06592.
  • Huang, Y., R. Kang, J. Mulder, T. Zhang, and L. Duan. 2015. “Nitrogen Saturation, Soil Acidification, and Ecological Effects in a Subtropical Pine Forest on Acid Soil in Southwest China.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120 (11): 2457–2472.
  • Li, Y., B. A. Schichtel, J. T. Walker, D. B. Schwede, X. Chen, C. M. B. Lehmann, M. A. Puchalski et al. 2016. “Increasing Importance of Deposition of Reduced Nitrogen in the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (21): 5874–5879. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525736113.
  • Liu, X., W. Xu, E. Du, Y. Pan, and K. Goulding. 2016. “Reduced Nitrogen Dominated Nitrogen Deposition in the United States, but Its Contribution to Nitrogen Deposition in China Decreased.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (26): E3590–3591. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607507113.
  • Mo, J., W. Zhang, W. Zhu, Y. Fang, D. Li, and P. Zhao. 2007. “Response of Soil Respiration to Simulated N Deposition in a Disturbed and a Rehabilitated Tropical Forest in Southern China.” Plant and Soil 296 (1): 125–135. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9303-8.
  • Pan, Y., S. Tian, D. Liu, Y. Fang, X. Zhu, Q. Zhang, B. Zheng et al. 2016. “Fossil Fuel Combustion-related Emissions Dominate Atmospheric Ammonia Sources during Severe Haze Episodes: Evidence from 15N-stable Isotope in Size-resolved Aerosol Ammonium.” Environmental Science & Technology 50 (15): 8049–8056. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00634.
  • Pan, Y., S. Tian, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, X. Zhu, J. Gao, W. Huang et al. 2018. “Identifying Ammonia Hotspots in China Using a National Observation Network.” Environmental Science & Technology 52 (7): 3926–3934. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05235.
  • Pan, Y. P., Y. S. Wang, G. Q. Tang, and D. Wu. 2012. “Wet and Dry Deposition of Atmospheric Nitrogen at Ten Sites in Northern China.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12 (14): 6515–6535. doi:10.5194/acp-12-6515-2012.
  • Pitcairn, C. E. R., I. D. Leith, L. J. Sheppard, M. A. Sutton, D. Fowler, R. C. Munro, S. Tang et al. 1998. “The Relationship between Nitrogen Deposition, Species Composition and Foliar Nitrogen Concentrations in Woodland Flora in the Vicinity of Livestock Farms.” Environmental Pollution 102 (1): 41–48. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80013-4.
  • Sheppard, L. J., I. D. Leith, T. Mizunuma, J. Neil Cape, A. Crossley, S. Leeson, M. A. Sutton et al. 2011. “Dry Deposition of Ammonia Gas Drives Species Change Faster than Wet Deposition of Ammonium Ions: Evidence from a Long-term Field Manipulation.” Global Change Biology 17 (12): 3589–3607. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02478.x.
  • Vitousek, P. 1997. “Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems.” Science 277 (5325): 494–499. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494.
  • Warner, J. X., R. R. Dickerson, Z. Wei, L. L. Strow, Y. Wang, and Q. Liang. 2017. “Increased Atmospheric Ammonia over the World’s Major Agricultural Areas Detected from Space.” Geophysical Research Letters 44 (6): 2875–2884. doi:10.1002/2016GL072305.
  • Wesely, M. L. 1989. “Parameterization of Surface Resistances to Gaseous Dry Deposition in Regional-scale Numerical Models.” Atmospheric Environment 23 (6): 1293–1304. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4.
  • Xia, J., S. Niu, and S. Wan. 2009. “Response of Ecosystem Carbon Exchange to Warming and Nitrogen Addition during Two Hydrologically Contrasting Growing Seasons in a Temperate Steppe.” Global Change Biology 15 (6): 1544–1556. doi:10.1111/gcb.2009.15.issue-6.
  • Xu, W., X. S. Luo, Y. P. Pan, L. Zhang, A. H. Tang, J. L. Shen, Y. Zhang et al. 2015. “Quantifying Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition through a Nationwide Monitoring Network across China.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15 (21): 12345–12360. doi:10.5194/acp-15-12345-2015.
  • Zhang, W., W. Shen, S. Zhu, S. Wan, Y. Luo, J. Yan, K. Wang, et al. 2015. “CAN Canopy Addition of Nitrogen Better Illustrate the Effect of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Ecosystem?”. Scientific Reports 5: 11245. doi:10.1038/srep11245.