185
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Percutaneous laser ablation of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: clinical efficacy and anatomical considerations

, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 75-82 | Received 16 Sep 2020, Accepted 11 Dec 2020, Published online: 29 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common type of thyroid cancer; despite its generally indolent course, patients often develop local post-operative recurrences. Re-operation, however, holds a high complication rate, while at the same time, not all patients benefit from radioiodine ablation. This systematic review investigates the application of laser ablation therapy (LAT) for cervical lymph node metastases as an additional treatment modality.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Medline electronic database and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible articles.

Results: Five studies were included in the systematic review. All studies included patients with metastatic lymph nodes from papillary thyroid carcinoma, that were unsuitable for further radioiodine or surgical treatment. Patients were treated with two different LAT devices. Regardless of the utilized assessment modalities, all researchers reported significant outcomes on local disease control. No permanent complications were observed.

Conclusions: LAT is relatively safe and effective for the treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Article Highlights

  • Patient selection criteria

  • Pre- and post-treatment assessment

  • System and Procedure

  • Assessment of response

  • Efficacy

  • Complications

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose. 

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.