415
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Potential impact of inorganic nanoparticles on macronutrient digestion: titanium dioxide nanoparticles slightly reduce lipid digestion under simulated gastrointestinal conditions

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1087-1101 | Received 06 Feb 2017, Accepted 15 Oct 2017, Published online: 21 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles are used in some food products to alter their optical properties, such as whiteness or brightness. These additives typically contain a population of TiO2 nanoparticles (d < 100 nm), which has led to concern about their potential toxicity. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of TiO2 particles on the gastrointestinal fate of oil-in-water emulsions using a simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) that includes mouth, stomach, and small intestine phases. Theoretical predictions suggested that TiO2 nanoparticles might inhibit lipid digestion through two physicochemical mechanisms: (i) a fraction of the lipase adsorbs to TiO2 particle surfaces, thereby reducing the amount available to hydrolyze lipid droplets; (ii) some TiO2 particles adsorb to the surfaces of lipid droplets, thereby reducing the lipid surface area exposed to lipase. The importance of these mechanisms was tested by passing protein-coated lipid droplets (2%, w/w) through the simulated GIT in the absence and presence of TiO2 (0.5%, w/w) nanoparticles (18 nm) and fine particles (167 nm). Changes in particle characteristics (size, organization, and charge) and lipid digestion were then measured. Both TiO2 nanoparticles and fine particles had little impact on the aggregation state and charge of the lipid droplets in the different GIT regions, as well as on the rate and extent of lipid digestion. This suggests that the theoretically predicted impact of particle size on lipid digestion was not seen in practice.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dilpreet Singh of Harvard University for the X-ray analysis of the titanium dioxide samples. This material was partly based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, USDA, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station (MAS00491) and USDA, NRI Grants [2013-03795, 2014-67021, 2016-08782] and National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, USDA, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station (MAS00491) and USDA, NRI Grants [2013-03795, 2014-67021, 2016-08782] and National Institute of Food and Agriculture.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.