Distinguishing intellectual humility and general humility

Abstract

Two studies provide evidence for distinguishing intellectual humility (IH) from general humility (GH). Humility involves (a) an Accurate View of Self and (b) the ability to regulate egotism and cultivate an other-oriented stance; IH is a subdomain of humility that involves (a) having an accurate view of one’s intellectual strengths and limitations and (b) the ability to negotiate ideas in a fair and inoffensive manner. First, we present a theoretical framework for distinguishing these constructs. In Study 1, with a sample of undergraduate students (N = 1097), we used confirmatory factor analysis to provide empirical evidence for this distinction. We also found that IH predicted unique variance in openness to experience relative to GH. In Study 2, we examined additional evidence of discriminant validity with another sample of college students (N = 355). IH also predicted unique variance in need for cognition, objectivism, and religious ethnocentrism relative to GH.

Keywords:

• humility
• measurement
• intellectual humility

Additional information

Funding

We would like to acknowledge the generous financial support of Fuller Theological Seminary/Thrive Center in concert with the John Templeton Foundation, [grant number 108] (Intellectual Humility in Religious Leaders), as well as the John Templeton Foundation [grant number 29630], The Development, Validation, and Dissemination of Measures ofIntellectual Humility and Humility; [grant number 14979], Relational Humility: An Interdisciplinary Approach to theStudy of Humility; [grant number 48321], Behavioral Measures of Humility in Couples). The opinions expressed inthis publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Fuller Thrive Center or theJohn Templeton Foundation.