Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 5, 2010 - Issue 6
1,411
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developing policy options for SARS and SARS-like diseases – a Delphi study

, , , &
Pages 663-675 | Received 05 Sep 2008, Published online: 16 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

The objective of the SARSControl Delphi study was to develop options for national and international emerging infectious diseases policies. The aim of this paper is to present the results of the study, which gathered expert opinions on gaps and inconsistencies concerning preparedness and response planning for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and SARS-like diseases. The Delphi technique was employed, which comprised a pilot round, two written rounds and a face-to-face meeting. The Delphi panel consisted of 38 experts from 22 countries, who highlighted the necessity to test plans and stressed the importance of surveillance measures for the swift containment of communicable disease outbreaks and the inclusion of detailed triage plans in national pandemic plans. The experts also suggested a need to define criteria for testing pandemic preparedness plans at different regional levels. New policy alternatives were identified, such as the need for generic plans on pandemics and universal access to healthcare during an outbreak. The usefulness of some non-medical interventions, such as bans on travel, could not be established and need further research. Dissemination of the findings will help to bridge gaps and rectify inconsistencies in current pandemic planning and response strategies for SARS and SARS-like diseases, as well as add valuable knowledge towards the development of national and international emerging infectious disease policies.

Acknowledgements

This work was done as part of ‘SARSControl: Effective and acceptable strategies for the control of SARS and new emerging infections in China and Europe’, a European Commission project funded within the Sixth Framework Programme, Thematic Priority Scientific Support to Policies, contract number: SP22-CT-2004-003824.

The authors express their gratitude to Catherine Floyd for her constructive comments and textual revision of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.