Player or referee? Aid effectiveness and the governance of health policy development: Lessons from Viet Nam

Abstract

Viet Nam is one of the brightest stars in the constellation of developing countries. Its remarkable achievements in reducing poverty and improving health and education outcomes are well known, and as a result it has enjoyed generous aid programmes. Viet Nam also has a reputation for taking a strong lead in disciplining its donors and pushing for more efficient and effective forms of aid delivery, both at home and internationally.

This article discusses how efforts to improve the effectiveness of aid intersect with policy-making processes in the health sector. It presents a quantitative review of health aid flows in Viet Nam and a qualitative analysis of the aid environment using event analysis, participant observation and key informant interviews.

The analysis reveals a complex and dynamic web of incentives influencing the implementation of the aid effectiveness agenda in the health sector. There are contradictory forces within the Ministry of Health, within government as a whole, within the donor community and between donors and government. Analytical frameworks drawn from the study of policy networks and governance can help explain these tensions. They suggest that governance of health aid in Viet Nam is characterised by multiple, overlapping ‘policy networks’ which cut across the traditional donor–government divide. The principles of aid effectiveness make sense for some of these communities, but for others they are irrational and may lead to a loss of influence and resources. However, sustained engagement combined with the building of strategic coalitions can overcome individual and institutional incentives.

This article suggests that aid reform efforts should be understood not as a technocratic agenda but as a political process with all the associated tensions, perverse incentives and challenges. Partners thus need to recognise – and find new ways of making sense of – the complexity of forces affecting aid delivery.

Keywords:

• Viet Nam
• aid
• development
• governance
• health policy

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Andrew Cassels and Peter Hill for their review and comments. As the aid effectiveness process in Viet Nam is an on-going process, events described in this paper may have evolved since the paper was submitted in October 2009.

Notes

The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Health Organization.