Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 7, 2012 - Issue sup2: Framing Global Health Governance
1,834
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Access to medicines, market failure and market intervention: A tale of two regimes

Pages S127-S143 | Received 14 Mar 2012, Accepted 19 Jun 2012, Published online: 08 Oct 2012
 

Abstract

This study explores how an ‘Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)/trade regime’ has generated a particular set of problems regarding access to medicines despite patents on drugs being presented as economically necessary for reward and future drug innovation. These problems have also inspired and informed activities by so-called new actors in global health. This study argues that a parallel ‘pro-access regime’ has developed in order to correct some of the most high-profile issues associated with a dysfunctional global pharmaceutical market, especially problems regarding price and innovation that have been exacerbated by stringent global patent rights on new drugs. Therefore, the IPR/trade regime's basic role in global-health governance diverges from how it has been framed and understood, not least of all by its constituent agents and donors. The pro-access regime encompasses new actors in health such as Global Health Partnerships (e.g., GAVI Alliance and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria), major philanthropic foundations (e.g., the Gates and Clinton Foundations) and new access initiatives (e.g., UNITAID). The study problematises these actors' governance roles with respect to the overarching authority of the IPR/trade regime and makes a case that the two regimes should be understood as being closely connected with respect to the governance of access to medicines and the global political economy of pharmaceuticals.

Acknowledgements

This research has been made possible through funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme – Ideas Grant 230489 GHG. All views expressed remain those of the authors.

Notes

1. A perspective borne out by extensive interviews conducted with UN and other organisation personnel as part of the European Research Council (ERC) project.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.