Traditional healers as service providers in Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme: The wrong way forward?

Abstract

Concerned with the negative impacts of user fees on healthcare access and utilisation, following the enactment of a law in 2003, the Ghanaian government replaced the ‘cash-and-carry’ system with a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). Even though many Ghanaians rely on traditional medicine (TRM) for reasons of culture, cost and personal preference, the incipient NHIS does not cover the services of TRM practitioners. Consultations with health policy-makers suggest that, in as much as the government recognises the invaluable contributions of TRM practitioners and would like to incorporate them in the incipient scheme, the provision of TRM in the country is still too disorganised, with few if any formal protocols and codes of conduct. Consequently, the inclusion of TRM practitioners in the NHIS is premature. This scholarly review seeks to bring TRM and its practitioners into the mainstream of healthcare provision in Ghana. Possibilities for medical pluralism in Ghana will be discussed with reference to best practices in countries such as China, India and Vietnam. This paper promotes medical pluralism in the form of Active Collaboration Between Fully Recognised Health Systems where there will be equity, mutual respect and understanding among traditional healers and physicians.

Keywords:

• National Health Insurance System
• traditional medicine
• medical pluralism
• health policy