712
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

South African women's conceptualisations of and responses to sexual coercion in relation to hegemonic masculinities

, &
Pages 135-152 | Received 20 Jun 2014, Accepted 09 Feb 2015, Published online: 21 May 2015
 

Abstract

Despite the documented relationship between hegemonic norms of masculinities and South African men’s use of sexual violence, less is known about how women’s engagement with norms of masculinity influences their agency in sexually coercive experiences. This study applied a narrative approach to assess how women’s understandings of hegemonic male norms affected their perceptions of and responses to sexually coercive experiences. Twenty-five sexual history narrative interviews were conducted with women across five South African provinces representing a range of ages, language and sociocultural backgrounds. Interviews elicited stories of first experiences of sex and the range of sexual relationships through adulthood. Data were analysed using principles of thematic and narrative analysis. Coercive sexual experiences informed many women’s normative ideas about men’s sexuality including being impulsive, controlling and aggressive. This could underpin women’s limited ability to exercise agency and their increased vulnerability to sexual abuse. Some women reported levels of trust and respect in subsequent relationships, which typically involved deconstructing norms of men’s use of coercion and moving beyond self-blame and guilt. The findings highlight the need to appreciate the fluid and situated nature of women’s agency from a relational perspective in terms of how women condone and challenge gender norms that support men’s use of sexual violence in their relationships.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants who were willing to share their intimate stories with us. We would also like to acknowledge CADRE (Center of AIDS Development, Research & Evaluation) for supporting early research implementation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Codes for Participant Referencing

CBAY = Coffee Bay, Eastern Cape

CPT = Cape Town, Western Cape

GTOWN = Grahamstown, Eastern Cape

JNB = Johannesburg, Gauteng

NELS = Nelspruit, Mpumalanga

PTZB = Pietermaritzburg KwaZulu-Natal

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by USAID through Johns Hopkins Health Education South Africa (JHESSA); University of Cape Town Research Associateship and Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.