ABSTRACT
Recovery from disaster and displacement involves multiple challenges including accompanying survivors, documenting effects, and rethreading community. This paper demonstrates how African-American and Latina community health promoters and white university-based researchers engaged visual methodologies and participatory action research (photoPAR) as resources in cross-community praxis in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans. Visual techniques, including but not limited to photonarratives, facilitated the health promoters’: (1) care for themselves and each other as survivors of and responders to the post-disaster context; (2) critical interrogation of New Orleans’ entrenched pre- and post-Katrina structural racism as contributing to the racialised effects of and responses to Katrina; and (3) meaning-making and performances of women’s community-based, cross-community health promotion within this post-disaster context. This feminist antiracist participatory action research project demonstrates how visual methodologies contributed to the co-researchers’ cross-community self- and other caring, critical bifocality, and collaborative construction of a contextually and culturally responsive model for women’s community-based health promotion post ‘unnatural disaster’. Selected limitations as well as the potential for future cross-community antiracist feminist photoPAR in post-disaster contexts are discussed.
Acknowledgements
Thanks, first and foremost, to the Latino and African-American communities in New Orleans for sharing their experiences and stories with the community health promoters who serve their neighbourhoods. Thanks also to the health promoters, programme coordinators, and executive directors of the New Orleans collaborating organisations for their confidence in the project – and for sharing its results with their constituencies. Finally, thanks to Verena Niederhoefer, MA, Boston College, who served as a research assistant throughout this process and to the two anonymous reviewers, for their thoughtful reflections and feedback.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.