338
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Development ethics and evolving methods: a comparison of fair trade with the Millennium Villages Project

&
Pages 71-84 | Received 20 Nov 2012, Accepted 13 Feb 2014, Published online: 29 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

The motivations for rural and agricultural development in the twenty-first century are not different from previous centuries, but evolving technologies in the late twentieth century have altered many methods and institutional arrangements for accomplishing development. The internet has facilitated initiatives that in earlier decades would have required large, complex organizations in both donor and developing countries. We will compare the ethical and institutional strengths and weaknesses of two such initiatives in Malawi: a smallholder farmers organization involved in fair trade and the Millennium Village Project. These are two of a large array of institutions which are currently being used to benefit smallholder agricultural producers. We will examine their relative merits through the lenses of various ethical paradigms and show that the institutional arrangements of the two programs are complimentary in the evolution of agricultural trading systems linking the global north and south.

Notes on contributors

Tracy Lyn Beedy has worked in international development in Latin America and Africa since 1989. She completed her dissertation at Michigan State University in 2008, and the doctoral specialization in Ethics and Development in 2011. Since 2009, she has been an Associate Scientist and Scientist with the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Stephen L. Esquith has been working on ethical problems in developing countries since 1990. His research and teaching has focused on democratic transitions and development in Poland and Mali. He has written on the rule of law, the problem of democratic political education, mass violence and reconciliation, and moral and political responsibility. He is the author of Intimacy and Spectacle (Cornell University Press, 1994), a critique of classical and modern liberal political philosophy, and The Political Responsibilities of Everyday Bystanders (Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010) on mass violence and democratic political education.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.