Publication Cover
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies
An International Interdisciplinary Journal for Research, Policy and Care
Volume 18, 2023 - Issue 1
75
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigating the psychometric properties of the Parent Support Partner Outcome Tool

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 143-148 | Received 01 Jun 2021, Accepted 27 Oct 2022, Published online: 03 Nov 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Parent-to-parent mental health treatment approaches demonstrate a solid evidence base, though a tool to measure changes associated with this innovative service delivery approach has yet to appear in the literature. The Parent Support Partner (PSP) Outcome Tool was developed to evaluate a statewide parent-to-parent service for families of children presenting severe emotional and behavioral challenges. This study explored the factor structure and reliability of the PSP Outcome Tool. Participants were 1,502 Medicaid-eligible parents of children between the ages of 5–19 with SED (82%), I/DD (12%), or both SED and I/DD (5%) who enrolled in and participated in PSP Services across the state of Michigan from 2017 to 2020. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution (Bridging Collaborative Relationships, Empowerment, Navigating Resources). Cronbach’s alpha was high (0.95) for the resulting 23-item outcome tool, and the three factors (i.e. Bridging Collaborative Relationships = 0.91, Empowerment = 0.90, Navigating Resources = 0.84). The factor structure of the scale and the need to establish additional validity support (i.e. predictive, convergent, divergent validity) for its use with diverse groups of parents are discussed.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Barry DeCicco for his assistance and support with statistical analysis.

Disclosure statement

This research is funded through the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, which may lead to potential financial or business interests for authors 5 and 6 due to their employment with the organization that may be affected by research reported in the enclosed paper. Additionally, author 7 has a business interest in the positive reflection of the service presented in the paper. Authors 1-4 critically examined the edits provided by authors 5-7 to manage potential conflicts arising from their involvement.

Additional information

Funding

The work was a collaboration between Michigan State University and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. It was supported by funds from Substance Abuse and Mental HealthServices Administration, Community Mental Health Block Grant through the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (E20222735-001).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.