![Sample our Environment & Agriculture journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5934/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Agriculture.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Eelgrass meadows are a common feature in shallow waters along the Norwegian coast, where they provide a habitat for a diverse infaunal community. Recreational boat anchoring and moorings physically scour seagrass and may affect the ecosystem functioning and resilience of the system to natural and anthropogenic disturbances. A small-scale eelgrass (Zostera marina) removal experiment was conducted to study the effects on macro- and meiofauna. Entire plants, including the rhizomes, were removed from 4 m2 patches in three eelgrass meadows in the inner Oslofjord in October 2010. Core samples were taken after a recovery period of 10 months, from the removed patches as well as from the surrounding meadow. Macrofauna (>500 μm) and meiofauna (63–500 μm) in the sediment were investigated for possible effects of the eelgrass removal. Macrofauna and meiofauna composition were site specific and therefore location was identified as the main determinant for the infaunal community. The eelgrass did not regrow within the recovery period and bare sediment patches with only single eelgrass shoots were present during the sampling. Our analyses support an influence of the removal on individual species, but not the complete community. In particular one species, the gastropod Peringia ulvae, was encountered in higher numbers in samples from the removed patches than in control samples. From a management perspective, such minor removal of eelgrass, on the scale of square metres, appears to have no long-lasting detrimental effect to the infaunal community in sheltered meadows with muddy sediments.
RESPONSIBLE EDITOR:
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank Hartvig Christie for help during the fieldwork, Rita Amundsen for assistance in sample processing and Hans Erik Karlsen for loan of the boat.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
