Demographic implications of predatory wrasses on low-density Diadema antillarum populations

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates and projects the effect of experimental removal of two species of wrasses, Thalassoma bifasciatum and Halichoeres bivittatus, on the demographic structure of the Caribbean sea urchin Diadema antillarum. For census periods ‘before’ and ‘after’ fish removal at treatment and un-manipulated control sites, size-based matrix population projections revealed the most important change in the sea urchin demography was increased survival of the medium size-class following removal of wrasses. The asymptotic growth rate (λ) exhibited no differences between periods for the control; however, the treatment displayed a significant increase in λ from 0.94 to 1.0. During the before period, the treatment population displayed lower λ than the control population, indicating site differences in urchin recruitment from the outset of the experiment, however after one year of maintenance of the predator removal treatment, the treatment population exhibited and increased growth rate to become similar to the control population; indicating predatory-release for the treatment population. Physiological status of sea urchins, as determined by righting times, exhibited no difference between treatment and control populations, or through time. Nil correlation was evident between righting activity and urchin size, indicating that urchin physiological status was not influenced by predation. Long-term demographic simulation indicated that the sea urchin population growth at the treatment site was negative and thus unviable predatory wrasse. However, only one year after fish removal, sea urchin population growth rate became positive. Therefore local population recovery for D. antillarum appears enhanced when abundance of wrasses is kept low.

SUBJECT EDITOR:

• Audrey J. Geffen

KEYWORDS:

• Predator removal
• recovery
• righting effect
• Caribbean
• Puerto Rico

Acknowledgements

The author wants to express his gratitude to the undergraduate students Julián López, Gabriel López and Ligia Pentzke for supporting the fieldwork.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was possible thanks to the logistical support provided by the Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation (C.A.T.E.C.), and the Puerto Rico Center of Environmental Neuroscience (P.R.C.E.N.), of the University of Puerto Rico.