241
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Length–weight relationship and seasonal variations in diet composition of whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in the South-eastern Black Sea

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 305-316 | Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 11 Apr 2023, Published online: 12 May 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The sex ratio, length–weight relationship (LWR) and diets based on stomach contents of whiting (Merlangius merlangus) were investigated in the south-eastern Black Sea, Turkey. A total of 3507 females (7.5–24.0 cm), 1602 males (9.4–20.0 cm), and 78 unidentified sex (5.5–16.5 cm) whiting were caught during monthly sampling from February to December 2017. The sex ratio was dominated by females, and their ratio (♀:♂, 1:0.46) significantly deviated from 1:1. The LWR indicated a negative allometric growth for males, while females had a positive allometric growth pattern. The stomach content analysis based on the relative importance index (IRI%) indicated exclusively piscivorous diets dominant by Sprattus sprattus and Engraulis encrasicolus made up more than 91 IRI% of the total diets of M. merlangus. The modified Costello-Amundsen’s graphical analyses evinced the specialized feeding strategy of M. merlangus throughout this study. The contribution of these two preys to the diets of M. merlangus showed considerable seasonal variations that were totally dependent on their abundance. Sprattus sprattus contributed to more than 98% of the total diets during June, July and August, while in the following months, E. encrasicolus appeared to take its position. Based on fish size, a general trend of a rise in prey diversity was found with increasing fish size. Also, the contribution of S. sprattus tended to decrease with increasing predator size, which is replaced by a rise in E. encrasicolus contribution. Hence, larger M. merlangus predominantly fed on E. encrasicolus while smaller size predators preferred to feed on S. sprattus.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies (GDAR): [Grant Number TAGEM/HAYSUD/2015/A11/P-02/9].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.