Trauma simulation training: a randomized controlled trial ­evaluating the effectiveness of the Imperial Femoral Intramedullary Nailing Cognitive Task Analysis (IFINCTA) tool

Abstract

Background and purpose — Cognitive task analysis (CTA) has been used extensively to train pilots and in other surgical specialties. However, the use of CTA within orthopedics is in its infancy. We evaluated the effectiveness of a novel CTA tool to improve understanding of the procedural steps in antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing.

Material and methods — Design: A modified Delphi technique was used to generate a CTA from 3 expert orthopedic trauma surgeons for antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing. The written and audiovisual information was combined to describe the technical steps, decision points, and errors for each phase of this procedure Validation: A randomized double-blind controlled trial was undertaken with 22 medical students (novices) randomized into 2 equal groups. The intervention group were given the CTA tool and the control group were given a standard operative technique manual. They were assessed using the validated “Touch Surgery™” application assessment tool on femoral intramedullary nailing.

Results — The pre-test scores between the two groups were similar. However, the post-test scores were statistically significantly better in the intervention group compared with the control group. The improvement (post-test median scores) in the intervention group compared with the control group was 20% for patient positioning and preparation, 21% for femoral preparation, 10% for proximal locking, and 19% for distal locking respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).

Interpretation — This is the first multimedia CTA tool in femoral intramedullary nailing that is easily accessible, user-friendly, and has demonstrated significant benefits in training novices over the traditional use of operative technique manuals.

Study and tool design: RB, KS, RB, and CMG. Data collection and analysis: RB, KS, and BA. CTA tool Delphi: IS, RB. and CMG. Writing and editing the manuscript: RB, KS, RB, and CMG.

Thanks are offered to Mr Victor Lesk for his help in designing the wizard tool.

Acta thanks Li Felländer-Tsai and Christian Krettek for help with peer review of this study.