Publication Cover
Journal of Mathematics and Music
Mathematical and Computational Approaches to Music Theory, Analysis, Composition and Performance
Volume 16, 2022 - Issue 3: Tribute to Jack Douthett; Guest Editor: Jason Yust
881
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Jack Douthett and mathematical music theory

Pages 249-252 | Received 27 Oct 2022, Accepted 28 Oct 2022, Published online: 29 Nov 2022

Abstract

Jack Douthett's work over three decades was central to defining an era in mathematical theory. The present special issue attests to his abiding influence over the field, as well as the energy he brought to research in all areas of mathematical music theory through his collaborations, correspondence, and relationships.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classifications:

When Jack Douthett had passed away in May of 2021, it was a given that this Journal would do something to honour his legacy. He was one of the founders of the Journal and the Society for Mathematics and Computation in Music in 2007, and his work was crucial to growing the field to the point where it could support an independent society and journal. My hope for this issue is to highlight the importance of his work, and to give a picture of his dedication and the inexhaustible energy he brought to breaking new ground in mathematical music theory.

I find it striking how Douthett's body work is at once large, spanning many years and many articles, and broad in its influence, but also remarkably unified. The ideas that appeared in his entrée into mathematical music theory, his article with John Clough, “Maximally Even Sets” (CitationClough and Douthett 1991), thread through his entire output. Specifically, two concepts, evenness and voice leading, are present across the span of Douthett's oeuvre and essential to his influence on twenty-first-century music theory, evenness and voice leading, and have their source in the way Clough and Douthett define maximal evenness. Another important aspect of this article has to do not so much with its content but how it came to be, establishing a collaborative spirit that I believe guided Douthett throughout his career.

The concept of evenness and its importance in defining basic objects of music theory, chords and scales, is the one most foregrounded in CitationClough and Douthett 1991. Douthett would continue to explore mathematical representations of evenness throughout his life. While maximal evenness effectively described the most common scalar collections of music theory, the pentatonic, whole-tone, diatonic, and octatonic, the common chords were only maximally even as subsets of the diatonic. The idea of second-order maximal evenness neatly accounts for major, minor, and diminished triads, and typical varieties of seventh chord (major, minor, dominant, half-diminished). He and Clough applied this idea to the ancient system of Indian scales in CitationClough et al. 1993 and CitationClough, Cuciurean, and Douthett 1997. In collaboration with Richard Krantz (CitationDouthett and Krantz 1996; CitationKrantz, Douthett, and Doty 1998) Douthett showed that maximal evenness had applications outside of music in physics. The concept as defined by CitationClough and Douthett (1991), however, did not immediately generalize. In a collaboration with Steven Block (CitationBlock and Douthett 1994) he explored some possible ways one could quantify the evenness of a set more generally. This work leads directly to his final article, published in this issue (CitationDouthett et al. 2022), which addresses the evenness of partitions. A set might be seen as a simple case of a partition of the 12-tone aggregate, separating it into two complementary sets. CitationDouthett et al. (2022) extend concepts of evenness to partitions into three or more sets. This article is a fitting culmination of a lifetime of work in music theory, and we at the Journal of Mathematics and Music are honoured to be able to publish it.

A less obvious feature of CitationClough and Douthett 1991 is its importance to the concept of voice leading that would emerge as a central contribution of mathematical music theory in the 1990s. It is typical to formalize voice leading as a mapping from one set to another, as in the influential theories of CitationLewin (1998) and CitationStraus (2003). Beyond the formalization, however, it is clear that concepts of proximity are essential to the idea of voice leading. This makes sense given the common meaning of the term in music theory, where pitch proximity is often essential to defining voices or lines. The strong group-theoretic foundations of earlier mathematical music theory, in which the integers modulo 12 typically functioned as a first principle, led earlier theorists away from incorporating concepts of distance, which are not natural to groups (a point made forcefully by CitationTymoczko 2009). Nonetheless, Richard Cohn, in early work that he discusses in his introduction to Douthett's letters (CitationCohn 2022), focused on a concept of voice-leading distance (“parsimony”) defined as a relation (“P-relation”).

Douthett's work on voice-leading networks, which began in letters building on Cohn's ideas, some of which are transcribed and published in this issue (CitationDouthett 2022aCitation2022b), is some of his most influential. Networks of chords are eminently practical tools for theorists and analysts, and single-semitonal voice leading is a useful relation for many applications. When one constructs such a lattice for a limited number of the most even chords of a given cardinality the result is typically some kind of cubic lattice, with dimension corresponding to the number of voices that can move up or down at a given time. CitationDouthett and Steinbach (1998) constructed such lattices for major, minor, and augmented triads (“Cube Dance”) and minor, dominant, half-diminished, and diminished sevenths (“Power Towers”). These became important referential structures for the voice-leading-based theories of CitationCohn (2012) and CitationTymoczko (2011), among many others. The idea of cubic lattices continued to yield fresh music-theoretic fruit years later, as CitationDouthett, Steinbach, and Hermann (2018) demonstrate.

It may not have been initially obvious that CitationClough and Douthett 1991 had any direct relationship to these ideas about parsimony and voice leading. However, Clough and Douthett's way of defining maximal evenness, their J-function, was a crucial departure from the integers modulo 12 as the basis of mathematical music theory. This function, which maps one equal division of the octave (e.g. equiheptatonic) into another (e.g.12-tone) using a floor function is defined on real numbers modulo the octave, not just integers. Concepts of distance are natural to the real numbers, so it is easy to see how a diatonic scale is close to an even division of the octave by 7. The floor function is specifically premised on the idea of proximity.

The significance of the concept of distance underlying the J-function to voice leading would not be entirely clear until later when Douthett published his chapter on filtered point-symmetry (CitationDouthett 2008). In a sense, filtered point-symmetry was nothing more than a visualization of nth-order maximal evenness and the underlying mechanism of J-functions. This visualization had the important effect of more clearly reifying the voices defined by the process, as “beacons” passing through multiple filters. As Douthett then subjected the filter configurations to dynamic processes, the fixed identity of the beacons became voices. The process restricts the motion of voices to small distances as the filters rotate continuously, and through this mechanism Douthett could derive all the important progressions highlighted by neo-Riemannian theory. His work on filtered point-symmetry was further developed by Richard Plotkin in his dissertation (CitationPlotkin 2010) and in collaboration with Douthett (CitationPlotkin and Douthett 2013). A contribution to this issue by CitationAsensi Arranz and Noll (2022) further expands upon filtered point-symmetry, discussing historical precedents for its circular model, and eliciting further mathematical and music-theoretic ramifications of the idea.

Another notable aspect of Douthett's body of work, evident in that first paper with John Clough through to CitationDouthett et al. 2022, is how collaborative it is. This is an unmistakable aspect of his character as a thinker, and crucial to the quality and influence of his work. Remembering the story Jack told of how he initially came to collaborate with John Clough, beginning with Clough's enthusiastic response to a letter from Jack, a complete stranger to him, I like to think that this initial collaboration with Clough inspired Jack's lifelong capacious intellectual generosity towards anyone with an interesting idea, regardless of their status as music theorists or lack thereof. Probably it was mostly just his character, though. The number of co-authors he published with, and also the volume of unpublished correspondence he produced, attests to his collaborative nature. The small sample of these that we publish in this issue (CitationDouthett 2022aCitation2022b) give a taste of the mathematical and music-theoretic richness of these letters, some of which found its way into published articles, while much of it has yet to do so.

Many of the tributes in CitationKrantz 2022 mention this aspect of Douthett as a thinker and collaborator. The number of people that he shared the gifts of his insights with in this way is impressive; while he certainly corresponded heavily with his many co-authors, he also had quite substantial correspondence with theorists who were not co-authors. I can personally attest: Jack sent me significant letters (alas, electronically and not hand-written!) on multiple topics such as higher-order maximal evenness, filtered point-symmetry, and the discrete Fourier transform, which influenced my thinking about all of those topics.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Leah Kier who has done so much to honour Jack since his passing, and thanks to B.C. Nowlin studios who has generously allowed us to use the following image, Jack's favourite painting, by B.C. Nowlin, entitled “Victory.”

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Asensi Arranz, Roger, and Thomas Noll. 2022. “Turning the Volvelle: Exploring Jack Douthett's Voice Leading Dynamics.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Block, Steven, and Jack Douthett. 1994. “Vector Products and Intervallic Weighting.” Journal of Music Theory 38 (1): 21–41.
  • Clough, John, John Cuciurean, and Jack Douthett. 1997. “Hyperscales and the Generalized Tetrachord.” Journal of Music Theory 41 (1): 67–100.
  • Clough, John, and Jack Douthett. 1991. “Maximally Even Sets.” Journal of Music Theory 35 (1/2): 93–173.
  • Clough, John, Jack Douthett, N. Ramanathan, and Lewis Rowell. 1993. “Early Indian Heptatonic Scales and Recent Diatonic Theory.” Music Theory Spectrum 15 (1): 36–58.
  • Cohn, Richard. 2012. Audacious Euphony: Chromaticism and the Triad's Second Nature. Oxford Studies in Music Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohn, Richard. 2022. “Jack Douthett's Letters: Introduction.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Douthett, Jack. 2008. “Filtered Point-Symmetry and Dynamical Voice-Leading.” In Music Theory and Mathematics: Chords, Collections, and Transformations, edited by Martha Hyde Jack Douthett and Charles J. Smith, 72–106. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Douthett, Jack. 2022a. “Jack Douthett's Letters on P-Relations, 1992–1997, Ed. Richard Cohn and Dani Zanuttini-Frank.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Douthett, Jack. 2022b. “Letters on Hook's Group, 2000, Edited by Dani Zanuttini-Frank.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Douthett, Jack, and Richard Krantz. 1996. “Energy Extremes and Spin Configurations for the One-Dimensional Antiferromagnetic Ising Model with Arbitrary-Range Interaction.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 37 (7): 3334–3353.
  • Douthett, Jack, and Peter Steinbach. 1998. “Parsimonious Graphs: A Study in Parsimony, Contextual Transformations, and Modes of Limited Transposition.” Journal of Music Theory 42 (2): 241–263.
  • Douthett, Jack, Peter Steinbach, and Richard Hermann. 2018. “Hypercubes and the Generalized Cohn Cycle.” In Mathematical Music Theory: Algebraic, Geometric, Combinatorial, Topological and Applied Approaches to Understanding Musical Phenomena, edited by M. Montiel and R. W. Peck, 21–46. Singapore: World Scientific.
  • Douthett, Jack, Peter Steinbeck, Robert Peck, and Richard Krantz. 2022. “Partitions, Their Classes, and Multicolor Evenness.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Krantz, Richard, ed. 2022. “Colleague, Collaborator, Friend: Jack Douthett (1942–2021).” Journal of Mathematics and Music 16 (3).
  • Krantz, Richard J., Jack Douthett, and Steven D. Doty. 1998. “Maximally Even Sets and the Devil's-Staircase Phase Diagram for the One-Dimensional Ising Antiferromagnet with Arbitrary-Range Interaction.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 39 (9): 4675–4682.
  • Lewin, David. 1998. “Some Ideas About Voice-Leading Between PCSets.” Journal of Music Theory 42 (1): 15–72.
  • Plotkin, Richard. 2010. “Transforming Transformational Analysis: Applications of Filtered Point-Symmetry.” PhD thesis, University of Chicago.
  • Plotkin, Richard, and Jack Douthett. 2013. “Scalar Context in Musical Models.” Journal of Mathematics and Music 7 (2): 103–125.
  • Straus, Joseph. 2003. “Uniformity, Balance, and Smoothness in Atonal Voice Leading.” Music Theory Spectrum 25 (2): 305–352.
  • Tymoczko, Dmitri. 2009. “Generalizing Musical Intervals.” Journal of Music Theory 53 (2): 227–254.
  • Tymoczko, Dmitri. 2011. Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.