Effects of load matched isokinetic versus isotonic blood flow restricted exercise on neuromuscular and muscle function

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to examine neuromuscular function, muscle fatigue, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and muscle swelling between isokinetic and isotonic leg extensions with blood flow restriction (BFR). Fourteen (21 ± 2years; 160cm ± 3.8; 61kg ± 9.1) trained women performed 75 (1 × 30,3 × 15) submaximal (30% of maximal strength), unilateral, isokinetic and isotonic leg extensions with BFR (60% of total arterial occlusion pressure). Before and after exercise, subjects performed maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) and muscle thickness (MT) was assessed with ultrasound. RPE was recorded across all sets and surface electromyography (EMG) was assessed during the MVIC muscle actions. Separate repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine MVIC, MT, RPE and neuromuscular function. There were greater reductions in MVIC torque and EMG mean power frequency following isotonic (46.2 ± 17.1%; 16.4 ± 7.9%) than isokinetic (17.9 ± 10.9%;6.5 ± 6.3%). RPE was also higher during isotonic (7.5 ± 2.2), than isokinetic (5.7 ± 1.9). There were no differences in EMG amplitude or MT increases (20 ± 2.1%) between conditions. Isotonic BFR elicited greater fatigue-induced decreases in muscular strength and greater RPE than isokinetic BFR, but similar MT and muscle excitation responses for both conditions. Therefore, both isokinetic and isotonic may induce similar acute physiological responses, but isotonic BFR was associated with greater muscle fatigue and perceived effort.

Highlights

• Exercise modality affects the fatigue and perceptual responses when applying blood flow restriction.

• Despite greater utility, isotonic blood flow restriction was associated greater fatigue and perceived effort.

• Isotonic and isokinetic blood flow restriction elicited comparable neural changes.

KEYWORDS:

• Isotonic
• isokinetic
• occlusion
• EMG
• muscle fatigue
• torque

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for their participation throughout the duration of the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.