Publication Cover
Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict
Pathways toward terrorism and genocide
Volume 6, 2013 - Issue 1-3
1,161
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical papers

US public support for drone strikes against asymmetric enemies abroad: Poll trends in 2013

Pages 90-97 | Received 17 Oct 2013, Accepted 29 Oct 2013, Published online: 28 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Military drones have been much in the news, and numerous polls have sought to measure public opinion relating to US drone strikes – a recent but already iconic image of asymmetric conflict. I examined eight US national polls conducted in 2013 and found that, while a consistent majority supports targeting terrorists with drones, there is a small but increasing minority that disapproves. This trend, along with strong disapproval of US drone strikes in many other countries, points to a possible future in which drones are less acceptable for the stronger side in asymmetric conflict or more accessible to the weaker side.

Notes

 1.CitationAckerman, “2012 Year of Drone.”

 2.CitationAssociated Press, “Rising US drone strikes”; CitationAl-Muslimi, “America Loses Yemeni People.”

 3.CitationBokhari, “Sharif Vow to Stop Strikes.”

 4.CitationYi, “An Eight Year War”; CitationGordon, “Kerry Pakistan Ending Strikes.”

 5.CitationChuter, 2013 “Britain's Taranis Demonstrator Delivered”; CitationUAV Global, “Dassault nEUROn”; CitationPerry, “Neuron Partners Show Know-How.”

 6.CitationClements, “China Copy RQ-170?”; CitationCenciotti, “Image China's New Drone.”

 7.CitationAlbert, “CASSIDIAN Accomplishes Test Flights”; CitationPocock, “EADS Forges Ahead.”

 8.CitationWikipedia, “Chief of Staff USAF”; CitationAnderson, “Air Force Love.”

 9.CitationFrieden, “Holder Drone Strike U.S.”

10.CitationLogiurato, “Rand Paul Filibuster Drone.”

11.CitationAckerman, “Drone Strikes More Deadly.”

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.