348
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

Retrieval-induced forgetting is associated with increased positivity when imagining the future

, , , &
Pages 351-360 | Received 16 Jan 2015, Accepted 13 Jul 2015, Published online: 05 Feb 2016
 

Abstract

People often think of themselves and their experiences in a more positive light than is objectively justified. Inhibitory control processes may promote this positivity bias by modulating the accessibility of negative thoughts and episodes from the past, which then limits their influence in the construction of imagined future events. We tested this hypothesis by investigating the correlation between retrieval-induced forgetting and the extent to which individuals imagine positive and negative episodic future events. First, we measured performance on a task requiring participants to imagine personal episodic events (either positive or negative), and then we correlated that measure with retrieval-induced forgetting. As predicted, individuals who exhibited higher levels of retrieval-induced forgetting imagined fewer negative episodic future events than did individuals who exhibited lower levels of retrieval-induced forgetting. This finding provides new insight into the possible role of retrieval-induced forgetting in autobiographical memory.

Notes

1Spearman's rho is less susceptible to the influence of outliers than Pearson's r because it is calculated using rank order instead of actual scores. To further control for the influence of outliers we re-ran the regression analysis after removing subjects who exhibited retrieval-induced forgetting scores or episodic future thinking scores that deviated from the mean in a given condition by more than three standard deviations (only one subject in the negative condition needed to be removed). The results of this analysis mirrored those of the full analysis. Specifically, the complete model was significant, F(3, 127) = 3.87, p = .01, R2 = .08, and the interaction term explained significant variance above and beyond that explained by valence and retrieval-induced forgetting alone, F(1, 127) = 5.10, p = .03, ΔR2 = .04.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.